D
Deleted member 429453
Guest
Which question exactly? No one is invading and "our" collective women are not being raped, whatever that question meant.gonna answer my questions?
Which question exactly? No one is invading and "our" collective women are not being raped, whatever that question meant.gonna answer my questions?
Terrorism is badThat's a non-argument. I could pose a similar question: Why aren't you scared of car crashes considering you're more likely to die from that than a white Christian?'. It's an intellectually dishonest argument that Muslim apologists use often. Being concerned about Islam doesn't preclude me from being concerned about other forms of terrorism, by the way.
You are not addressing my points, you are standing there trying to bat them away, because admitting it means you have to stop hating Muslims, that causes fear in you, it's easier to just hate someone and blame them
By your logic you should be really scared of white guys with guns, especially if they are young and been bullied at school
The difference is people aren't deliberately causing crashesThat's a non-argument. I could pose a similar question: Why aren't you scared of car crashes considering you're more likely to die from that than a white Christian?'. It's an intellectually dishonest argument that Muslim apologists use often. Being concerned about Islam doesn't preclude me from being concerned about other forms of terrorism, by the way.
Terrorism is bad
Any idiot knows that.
But it's intellectually barren to assume it's just cos "muslim"
It's just illogical
My point is you are using Islam and terrorism as one thing.....I addressed all your points, actually, and I never said anything about hating Muslims.
'Being concerned about Islam doesn't preclude me from being concerned about other forms of terrorism, by the way.' School shootings is a concern. So is Muslim terrorism, particularly on a global level.
Extremists, not Muslims, when you confuse the two you enter bigot territoryApparently not. You continue to downplay and divert attention.
Muslims are the deadliest and most predominant terrorists on a global level. It's not entirely because of Muslims, but they are one of the most common.
The difference is people aren't deliberately causing crashes
Extremists, not Muslims, when you confuse the two you enter bigot territory
Pretty sure you don't like extremists if they were Hindu, Christian, etc etc
goddamn dude - you too stupid to read?Which question exactly? No one is invading and "our" collective women are not being raped, whatever that question meant.
Not true1) Yes they are. People do indeed intentionally crash their vehicles. 2) It doesn't matter whether it's deliberate or not. The result is the same: dead people. So we shouldn't concern ourselves with school shootings until the issue of vehicular deaths is solved, by your own logic.
My point is you are using Islam and terrorism as one thing.....
And the many people who have been Christian and committed atrocities fit in where? Is Christianity therefore a dangerous terrorist breeding organisation?No, Muslims. You don't get to deny their Muslim card just because you consider what they're doing to be extreme. Muhammad was an extremist and indistinguishable from Muslim terrorists today. He's still Muslim.
Not true
When did a deliberate car crash kill 100 people? When did a guy drive into a school and run over everyone?
Not logical
Islam inspires and promotes terrorism. That doesn't mean all Muslims or all individuals who claim to adhere to Islam are terrorists themselves. People pick and choose what they want to believe, which is why you can have peaceful Muslims, despite the text advocating something entirely different.
What you should be concerned about is extremists.... Not Muslims, extremists are bad from any religion
And the many people who have been Christian and committed atrocities fit in where? Is Christianity therefore a dangerous terrorist breeding organisation?
If you can see the deliberate act of mass killing is different that vehicle deaths then it's not really easy to discuss with youIt's absolutely true.
'When did a...' Irrelevant question. There are more deaths attributed to vehicles than school shootings. The fact that the vehicle typically doesn't kill en masse doesn't change the fact that it kills more as a whole.
You are describing extremists therefore proving my point
The religion is interchangeable
I'm giving you the chance to clarify what the question you want megoddamn dude - you too stupid to read?
By that definition then all religions must be extremeNo, I'm describing actual religious people. They don't suddenly become non-Muslims just because they commit acts of violence. The religion itself is extreme, making their behavior the norm.