- Joined
- Aug 25, 2017
- Messages
- 4,271
- Reaction score
- 2,367
Do you think Tony would have done better?
Of course not, his boxing is terrible
Again, my point was solely about Conor's vaunted "power".
Do you think Tony would have done better?
Of course not, his boxing is terrible
Again, my point was solely about Conor's vaunted "power".
You know what that means?Conor literally beat Mendes with body kicks. Beat Max by the entire arsenal. Beat Nate with leg kicks. Stay salty, Payne.
That he can't punch anywhere near as his little groupies - like you - believe. I'm simply refuting Frode's comment about his monstrous left hand.
His "power" was a non factor Vs Floyd, he looked like a featherfisted bum. Literally Paulie level power. To put it in perspective, Pacquiao started his career at just over 100 pounds, and Floyd said he hits much harder than Conor "PillowFists" McGregory. Floyd winning is no surprise, Floyd exposing Conor's lack of power should be surprising to most, yeah, as the one thing the MMA community thought is that Conor was this huge puncher.
Conor is a better striker than Tony, that's obvious, my point is his success comes from very good timing and accuracy, not raw power. Ngannou is the opposite, he is all raw power.
And btw, your boy didn't get beat up by a boxing GOAT, no one believes that apart from Floyd and a few people in TMT. He got beat up by a 40 year old shell of an ATG who simply plodded forward like a Mexican journeyman and beat the fuck out of him without breaking a sweat.
Who has better striking has nothing to do with cardio.
Lol no. One is either better or they aren’t. You’re confusing cardio with skill. A person can get tired and be overwhelmed, but that doesn’t make their opponent the better striker. Simply the one with better cardio. I wasn’t thinking of who has better striking while fresh or not, but who the better striker is.lol of course it does. Pacing, efficiency, are huge parts of striking. You can be way better than your opponent for 2 rounds, but if he's better the last 3 then he's the better striker.
You're thinking of " who has better striking technique while fresh "
Lol no. One is either better or they aren’t. You’re confusing cardio with skill. A person can get tired and be overwhelmed, but that doesn’t make their opponent the better striker. Simply the one with better cardio. I wasn’t thinking of who has better striking while fresh or not, but who the better striker is.
What the fuck does that have to do with anything? Unless you believe mmath has any bearing on striking skill this post means absolutely nothingTony made barboza shoot for a panic takedown
Do you think Tony would have done better?
When has conor ever hurt anyone with a kick? his kicks are just spinning shit that always missesIs pretty obvious that conor got better kicks,hands.unless you're a ferg nuthugger
No you imbecile. The better striker is the one with the better skills. An inferior striker can maybe win 1 out of 10 fights with striking, and lose the other 9. That one win doesn’t make him the better striker. Lol. Was Anderson Silva a worse striker than Weidman?The better striker is the one who wins the striking match ya goof, and Cardio influences that.
Gotta say, it's always hilarious hearing people talk about how Conor's opponent just needs to survive until the later rounds and they'll win. Literally the only example of this happening in Conor's entire career is against Mayweather, a way better opponent than Conor will literally ever face in MMA, and who was able to pull it off precisely because he was indeed much better than Conor at boxing, particularly defence where he is the best defensive boer in history, again something that Conor doesn't have the same problem with in MMA.
Conor's had 2 decisions in his entire career and he won both of them. They were against Nate Diaz and Max Holloway, two guys known for having extreme cardio and taking over in later rounds. In 25 fights he's only had 3 go past the second round. Your gameplan is to do just that when statistically it's hasn't occurred in 88% of Conor's fights, and he won 66% of the ones that did? And of the ones that lasted under 2 rounds he won 88% of them?
The people who think that Conor's opponent is just going to drag out the fight are being delusional. His fights are quick affairs, and that favours him. Even when they're not he statistically still wins.
The Mayweather fight is actually an anomaly, not the norm. And again, Mayweather is one of the few people who could actually do that, precisely because he's the best defensive boxer in history.
Just because something could happen doesn't make it likely to happen. Especially not with someone who has as shit defence as Tony does, and gets hurt as often as he does by way less accurrate and powerful punchers than McGregor.
Wait -- I thought Conor only beat Nate Diaz because of legs kicks and because he was afraid to box him? How bout the body teeps on Chad? Or did Chad gas solely owing to two weeks notice?When has conor ever hurt anyone with a kick? his kicks are just spinning shit that always misses
God Damn. Logic regarding McGregor on Sherdog are about as rare as seeing a Sasquatch in broad daylight the city.Gotta say, it's always hilarious hearing people talk about how Conor's opponent just needs to survive until the later rounds and they'll win. Literally the only example of this happening in Conor's entire career is against Mayweather, a way better opponent than Conor will literally ever face in MMA, and who was able to pull it off precisely because he was indeed much better than Conor at boxing, particularly defence where he is the best defensive boer in history, again something that Conor doesn't have the same problem with in MMA.
Conor's had 2 decisions in his entire career and he won both of them. They were against Nate Diaz and Max Holloway, two guys known for having extreme cardio and taking over in later rounds. In 25 fights he's only had 3 go past the second round. Your gameplan is to do just that when statistically it's hasn't occurred in 88% of Conor's fights, and he won 66% of the ones that did? And of the ones that lasted under 2 rounds he won 88% of them?
The people who think that Conor's opponent is just going to drag out the fight are being delusional. His fights are quick affairs, and that favours him. Even when they're not he statistically still wins.
The Mayweather fight is actually an anomaly, not the norm. And again, Mayweather is one of the few people who could actually do that, precisely because he's the best defensive boxer in history.
Just because something could happen doesn't make it likely to happen. Especially not with someone who has as shit defence as Tony does, and gets hurt as often as he does by way less accurrate and powerful punchers than McGregor.