- Joined
- Aug 22, 2010
- Messages
- 32,744
- Reaction score
- 9,910
i dont know why your trying hard to defend him. He's still a loser and a psycho .
i dont know why your trying hard to defend him. He's still a loser and a psycho .
vivek is a loser and a psycho? man, every republican for the rest of time is gonna get the trump treatment, huh? jesus...
Maybe they should run people who are sane and respectable.
Moral means your moral values based on religion or based on whatever. Both pro and anti abortion base their views on this.
Most but not all also base their ideas on morals involved by different medical opinions.
Like when it is a human baby and when it is not or even if it is when a mother has the right to kill it.
logic of the left: anyone who's to the right of us is evil and or insane and must be stopped at all costs to "protect our democracy" which includes the use of The Trump Treatment (smears, lies, the media, intelligence agencies, and DOJ).
Except they are insane. The answer to fighting the drug cartel is to drone strike Mexico? Do you know how many Mexicans live in this country? Going to war with our southern neighbor is idiotic and that automatically disqualifies any candidate for me personally. Then you had Wednesday’s debate and everyone there is horny for war. Tim Scott says “we must be prepared for war with three continents so we need more military funding.” These people aren’t nuts to you?vivek is a loser and a psycho? man, every republican for the rest of time is gonna get the trump treatment, huh? jesus...
No one said that. What I said was that they should nominate sane, respectable rightists.
that's how they operate. they are good and true and anyone not in lockstep is evil, dangerous, crazy, or "extremist".
Except they are insane. The answer to fighting the drug cartel is to drone strike Mexico? Do you know how many Mexicans live in this country? Going to war with our southern neighbor is idiotic and that automatically disqualifies any candidate for me personally
Then you had Wednesday’s debate and everyone there is horny for war. Tim Scott says “we must be prepared for war with three continents so we need more military funding.” These people aren’t nuts to you?
I'm suggesting the "moral" stance of anti-abortion proponents is almost exclusively derived from religious ideology. There's practically zero consulting of science and medicine, hence how many "no exceptions" bills currently exist, and how the ones that do are being used. Right now, in many States, if women have at-risk pregnancies they are directly told by the State that their life matters less than the unborn's. I don't see any logical morality behind that.
I also find it comical to excuse killing of animals as alright because they're not human. Doesnt sound like a Godly notion to me if God created all creatures. That's just dominion ideology same as treating women as livestock is.
They didn't lead to Trump.Were Dubya, Jeb, the RNC not the GOP establishment? If not, who were you referring to?
The comment makes perfect sense. If a con man convinces someone to buy into a con, it's not because the other options were good or bad. It's that the swindler was better at selling his con. You're basically blaming the "establishment" that people bought into a con job. They tried to warn people. But the swindled preferred the story they were being sold over the truth because the truth didn't make them feel special and the con did.This comment is what doesn't make any sense. The right wing voting base bought into Trump just like the left bought into Obama. I didn't say anything about disregarding voters, I'm pointing out how awful the establishment candidate was that Trump was the preferred option.
Everyone in the GOP predicted this. You had a large number of the "establishment" come out and say it. They said it on Twitter. They said it in press releases. They said it on the campaign trail. They said it even after he was elected.You're revising history here. One guy predicted this. The majority of the establishment bent the knee. They continued to support him, even after Jan 6th.
See above.Yeah, it's very generic to describe in detail how Trump won the 2016 primary to debunk your claim. What is this nonsensical post?
The comment makes perfect sense. If a con man convinces someone to buy into a con, it's not because the other options were good or bad. It's that the swindler was better than selling his con. You're basically blaming the "establishment" that people bought into a con job. They tried to warn people. But the swindled preferred the story they were being sold over the truth because the truth didn't make them feel special and the con did.
vivek is a loser and a psycho? man, every republican for the rest of time is gonna get the trump treatment, huh? jesus...
lots of leftists calling out the RNC yet no one from their party. where are the democratic primaries or is biden being installed again? y'all running out in droves to vote for the corrupt kid sniffer again or the american psycho who's also selling out to china and will turn the country into a shit covered homeless hellscape like he did california.