Western Media ready to glorify another racist in Russia

[TheLastEmperorReurns]

please stop saying Caucus

In Russian, it's 'Kavkaz'. So I just assumed the English translation is 'Caucus'.

 

[bobgeese]

If you put an Italian in 1950s Sweden- the Swedish people wouldn't tell the difference between the Italian and the Arabs they see on TV.

That's the difference between Northern Europeans and Southern Europeans.

It was a joke.

 

[Feniamin]

Alexei Navalny will be Putin's main opponent in the 2018 presidential election.

The Western media is painting him as some sort of messianic figure:



Just 1 thing: he's a fucking racist.

-Called ethnic Georgians "rodents".

-Hates the Caucus [Middle Eastern part of Russia where people like Khabib come from].

It's a common theme with the way Western media outlets cover anti-Putin protests.

For example, many of the protests against Putin that you see pictures of actually capture neo-Nazi hooligan groups that the media never actually tells you about.

Just an example of the insane-level propaganda that multinational media corporations try to spoonfeed their viewers:



Really disgusting and pathetic.

Some real Matrix bullshit where they bluebill the people.

Most Americans walk around gullible and naive believing everything that the media shows them.

Isn't Navalny can't be registered as a candidate for a president election because he was found guilty in Kirovles criminal case?

 

[LC Shepard]

I follow Russian politics very closely and what the OP is talking about is pure nonsense. Are you one of those trolls from Savushkino str?

Navalny has immigration control policies but he is very mild on that topic. For reference he is way more mild than than Trump.

Navalny is primarily suppprted by the young, liberal minded part of the population, he is not some neo-nazi idol for fuck sake.

He and his offices are constantly raided by the authorities and he isnt even officially allowed to participate in the election so he is not the main opponent. There isn't one. And Ksenia the fake opposition representative doesnt count.

OP if full of shit.

 

[TheLastEmperorReurns]

I follow Russian politics very closely and what the OP is talking about is pure nonsense. Are you one of those trolls from Savushkino str?

Navalny has immigration control policies but he is very mild on that topic. For reference he is way more mild than than Trump.

Navalny is primarily suppprted by the young, liberal minded part of the population, he is not some neo-nazi idol for fuck sake.

He and his offices are constantly raided by the authorities and he isnt even officially allowed to participate in the election so he is not the main opponent. There isn't one. And Ksenia the fake opposition representative doesnt count.

OP if full of shit.

He's still "in the mix" as Dana White would say. He's not D/Q'ed.

And congratulations for saying exactly what the Western media says about him.

I see that, indeed, you have been following Russian politics very closely... on BBC, the Economist, and EuroNews. rofl

 

[snakedafunky]

He's still "in the mix" as Dana White would say. He's not D/Q'ed.

And congratulations for saying exactly what the Western media says about him.

I see that, indeed, you have been following Russian politics very closely... on BBC, the Economist, and EuroNews. rofl

So what is your theory on why the "western media" is representing him the wrong way. Like what is the point?
Is that simply to damage Putin?

 

[The ScorpioN]

I follow Russian politics very closely and what the OP is talking about is pure nonsense. Are you one of those trolls from Savushkino str?

Navalny has immigration control policies but he is very mild on that topic. For reference he is way more mild than than Trump.

Navalny is primarily suppprted by the young, liberal minded part of the population, he is not some neo-nazi idol for fuck sake.

He and his offices are constantly raided by the authorities and he isnt even officially allowed to participate in the election so he is not the main opponent. There isn't one. And Ksenia the fake opposition representative doesnt count.

OP if full of shit.

He's still "in the mix" as Dana White would say. He's not D/Q'ed.

And congratulations for saying exactly what the Western media says about him.

I see that, indeed, you have been following Russian politics very closely... on BBC, the Economist, and EuroNews. rofl

As opposed to you watching RT.

 

[TheLastEmperorReurns]

So what is your theory on why the "western media" is representing him the wrong way. Like what is the point?
Is that simply to damage Putin?

What is any reason for the West favoring one political candidate over another in a 2nd/3rd world country?

There is nothing new about this.

The US supported racist/fascist politicians in Latin America for half a century because they seemed favorable towards American interests.

In Russia's case- both Western European and American elite are interested in Russian politicians/government who are favorable towards the 1st world's interests rather than a strong, healthy, unified Russia.

Yelstin was a president well-known for his racist & offensive remarks. His horrible attitude towards Muslims and Orientals in Russia. His pure incompetency and lack of conscientious inclinations.

Yet the West touted him as some kind of hero and icon in Russia when the actual population thought he was an embarrassing pile of dog shit [who legitimately rigged the election and had no backing of the people- which the West curiously didn't report in any meaningful manner].

The Western status quo only wants people like Yeltsin in charge of Russia.

 

[snakedafunky]

What is any reason for the West favoring one political candidate over another in a 2nd/3rd world country?

There is nothing new about this.

The US supported racist/fascist politicians in Latin America for half a century because they seemed favorable towards American interests.

In Russia's case- both Western European and American elite are interested in Russian politicians/government who are favorable towards the 1st world's interests rather than a strong, healthy, unified Russia.

Yelstin was a president well-known for his racist & offensive remarks. His horrible attitude towards Muslims and Orientals in Russia. His pure incompetency and lack of conscientious inclinations.

Yet the West touted him as some kind of hero and icon in Russia when the actual population thought he was an embarrassing pile of dog shit [who legitimately rigged the election and had no backing of the people- which the West curiously didn't report in any meaningful manner].

The Western status quo only wants people like Yeltsin in charge of Russia.

But if this other guy is a Neo Nazi what makes you think the "West" would favor him?
EU - Russian relation are rather good at the moment all things considered.
Russia has the Gas Europe needs. That's something that can be done with Putin.
Why would Europe jeopardize all that for a Neo Nazi Russian.
Putin might not be the perfect candidate. But has shown to be a reasonable and reliable partner when it comes to doing business.

 

[Rusk]

I would vote for Navalny, Putin is a Cuck...

Also western liberals should be pro-Putin, it i still stange to me that Western Right-Wingers like Putin.

 

[Rusk]

Alexei Navalny will be Putin's main opponent in the 2018 presidential election.

The Western media is painting him as some sort of messianic figure:



Just 1 thing: he's a fucking racist.

-Called ethnic Georgians "rodents".

-Hates the Caucus [Middle Eastern part of Russia where people like Khabib come from].

It's a common theme with the way Western media outlets cover anti-Putin protests.

For example, many of the protests against Putin that you see pictures of actually capture neo-Nazi hooligan groups that the media never actually tells you about.

Just an example of the insane-level propaganda that multinational media corporations try to spoonfeed their viewers:



Really disgusting and pathetic.

Some real Matrix bullshit where they bluebill the people.

Most Americans walk around gullible and naive believing everything that the media shows them.

All i get from you TS is that you understand that Navalny wants to make Russia great again, and you want to suck a Dagestanian dick.

 

[TheLastEmperorReurns]

But if this other guy is a Neo Nazi what makes you think the "West" would favor him?

As long as he's favorable towards Western interests- Washington and Brussels have reason to prefer him over a strong patriotic pragmatist.

It's not to say that the West prefers racists, it's that the West prefers 2nd/3rd world leaders that bend over to them and they're willing to overlook their bad traits as long as they're willing to be puppets.

EU - Russian relation are rather good at the moment all things considered.

Improved dramatically since the Crimea fiasco. Hundreds of billions of dollars of economic value are being lost because Western European people are being pitted against Russia.

Russia has the Gas Europe needs. That's something that can be done with Putin.
Why would Europe jeopardize all that for a Neo Nazi Russian.
Putin might not be the perfect candidate. But has shown to be a reasonable and reliable partner when it comes to doing business.

That's 100% true.

The fundamental problem between Western Europe and Russia is that Russia's neighboring countries are being absorbed into the European Union while Russia's trade relationship with Europe continues to be the same as Europe has with Latin American or African countries- that is to same in no way customized as it should be for a country that's practically in Europe.

I can share economic papers with you that detail how aggressive trade unions can be towards countries they blockade.

If every neighboring country of [European] Russia gets absorbed into the European Union and Russia remains excluded- that's hundreds of billions of economic losses for Russia.

I don't want to detail a competitive analysis table here, but here's a simple one:

-Ukraine gets accepted into the European Union:

• Russia offers bread for $8, gets taxed $4. The final cost to consumers is $12.
• Germany offers bread for $10, gets taxed $0 because of European Union co-membership. The final cost to consumers is $10.

What ends up happening is that Russia loses out economically because of political reasons.

That, at its core, paints a picture of the animosity that Russia has towards the political body that is the European Union, which is as the subset of Russia's greater conflict against the most powerful military alliance in the world, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.

 

[Rusk]

What is any reason for the West favoring one political candidate over another in a 2nd/3rd world country?

There is nothing new about this.

The US supported racist/fascist politicians in Latin America for half a century because they seemed favorable towards American interests.

In Russia's case- both Western European and American elite are interested in Russian politicians/government who are favorable towards the 1st world's interests rather than a strong, healthy, unified Russia.

Yelstin was a president well-known for his racist & offensive remarks. His horrible attitude towards Muslims and Orientals in Russia. His pure incompetency and lack of conscientious inclinations.

Yet the West touted him as some kind of hero and icon in Russia when the actual population thought he was an embarrassing pile of dog shit [who legitimately rigged the election and had no backing of the people- which the West curiously didn't report in any meaningful manner].

The Western status quo only wants people like Yeltsin in charge of Russia.

You deserve public castration for lying

 

[TheLastEmperorReurns]

All i get from you TS is that you understand that Navalny wants to make Russia great again, and you want to suck a Dagestanian dick.

People like Navalny aren't interested in making Russia great, they're interested in reverting Russia back to a small, insignificant nationalist ethnostate that has no place or value in the modern world.

 

[TheLastEmperorReurns]

You deserve public castration for lying

What did I lie about? You weird pervert.

 

[Rusk]

People like Navalny aren't interested in making Russia great, they're interested in reverting Russia back to a small, insignificant nationalist ethnostate that has no place or value in the modern world.

When was it ever the case? in 1400s???

 

[TheLastEmperorReurns]

When was it ever the case? in 1400s???

Exactly, yes.

And since then Russia evolved into a multicultural, multinational world power that actually stands for something to the rest of the world.

Economic prosperity is definitely the most important thing to cultivate in Russia right now- but to dream of Russia as some kind of small ethnic state like Germany and Japan have historically been is small-minded and foolish.

 

[Rusk]

What did I lie about? You weird pervert.

You lie about Navalny being a racist. Just because he does not suck a muslim dick like you and wants stricter border policies does not mean he is Racist.

 

[Rusk]

Exactly, yes.

And since then Russia evolved into a multicultural, multinational world power that actually stands for something to the rest of the world.

Russia were never multicultural, it was always of Russian culture, and then when Bolsheviks destroyed Russian and its culture it became of Soviet culture. Other cultures in Russia were either integrated into Russian culture or they were tolerated at best. 80%+ of people in Russia are Russians and Russian got their own culture so gtfo with "multicultural Russia" bullshit.

 

[TheLastEmperorReurns]

You lie about Navalny being a racist. Just because he does not suck a muslim dick like you and wants stricter border policies does not mean he is Racist.

https://globalvoices.org/2013/07/25/ethnic-slurs-haunt-alexey-navalny/