- Joined
- Jul 4, 2009
- Messages
- 61,063
- Reaction score
- 30,976
He's kind of a baby though. Get someone like JVS to ignore you and you'll be in the big leagues.I made it!
My first ignore list spot!
Thanks, EGarrett!
He's kind of a baby though. Get someone like JVS to ignore you and you'll be in the big leagues.I made it!
My first ignore list spot!
Thanks, EGarrett!
Tbh i thinks its harder to troll as much as i have in the past and avoid dodge ignore lists so effectively imoHe's kind of a baby though. Get someone like JVS to ignore you and you'll be in the big leagues.
don't have anyone but i'm thinking of putting on ignore that guy that always signs his replies.
that's "it rubs the lotion on its skin" level creepy.
i work in a very formal environment. i'll be damned if i have to look at that giddy formalism in a fight forum as well.@IGIT is kind of a troll, but he's definitely capable of making good posts, and is pretty sharp and well-informed. That's the type of poster that I'd never put on my list.
Funny tension here, with people claiming it an honor to be ignored, or others claiming it's shameful to ignore annoying people. If it makes your time here better, why wouldn't you do it? I've never ignored somebody because I disagreed with their POV, only because they are annoying (spamming/trolling) or if they get way too personal. But it's kind of funny when you know people are quoting you in vain for months I suppose.
I agree that some of them do, on occasion. I simply don't find their signal to noise ratio good enough.(like Thuriasz's list is really incomprehensible to me because a lot of it is posters who make substantive contributions to discussions)
Yep, I've never even reported anyone either. I would only do so if someone was continuously sending me abusive and threatening messages.
What does this mean, let alone have to do with the discussion we were having?Excuse me. Are you someone that's arguing beside me for less government control... or do you typically take the stance to accumulate more power to that institution?
Let's see what's the situation these days.
This list has significantly improved my forum experience.
- CauseImbetta
- DevilsLettuce
Falsedawn- Fatchops
FIMN- fingercuffs
Fraser B- Gazwald
Happiness- J. Bernie Cunningham
JonnyRingo84- JosephDredd
KILL KILL- KnightTemplar
Last Samurai- Leroy Jenkins
LilMountain- M3t4tr0n
m52nickerson- Macalpinerules
MacDuffle- Mike90
mrbaapt- Prutfis
Rod1- Ruprecht (alas, can't be ignored since mod)
sadclown- sangreporsangre
seiger- silus_2000
Teen Wolf- uppercutbus
Voodoo_Child906
My list is the like the Bizarro version of this one, though perhaps slightly shorter.
If it worked in reverse, and there was like a "non-ignore list," most of Thuriasz's list would be on mine.
What does this mean, let alone have to do with the discussion we were having?
Oh, nothing, just your typical disingenuous shifting.
What I said was that centralizing of power isn't strictly left-wing. Then you went on one of your normal incoherent tangents.You told me I'm wrong about centralization being left-wing. Either you should be agreeing with me about dis-empowering government more than you actually let on, or you're supposing that granting more power to government isn't the same as centralizing power. If its the latter than you've gone full retard, where words have no meaning anymore.