*wonders if blaccbeard will call this out as a racist post
How can it be racist when its factually correct. Just study history
*wonders if blaccbeard will call this out as a racist post
Another Stormfront worthy post. Bravo.
And what if they don't? Your next sentences discount reasons why they might not have the same chances, if you place the blame for lack of success strictly on the individuals you ignore that the underlying assumption for your conclusion was violated.
Another Stormfront worthy post. Bravo.
It's funny that so many posters complain about racism having been redefined to include any criticism of minorities. From the war room I've actually learned the exact opposite. From my discussions with posters here I've learned the following aren't racist or aren't indicative of racist views:
-completely sharing David Duke's views on race
-sharing racial views with neo-nazis
-viewing particular ethnic groups as inherently inferior
-regularly using racial slurs
-supporting segregation
-opposing inter-racial relationships
-believing antebellum racial stereotypes
-suggesting that african-americans were better off under slavery
"Non-racists" in the war room have vehemently objected to being labeled racist for doing the above (and more). I guess, therefore, none of the above are indicative of being racist. What else could it be?
Every single poster I've called a racist in the War Room I've done so because of specific racist posts that they've made, posts I've usually responded to directly. Except for exceptional instances such a statement is usually only made after a multitude of bigoted posts. The fact that their threads get deleted or that every post they make might not be blatantly racist doesn't change that.I've generally found that most people who call others "racist" in lieu of making an argument, or confronting the opposition's points directly, are cowards.
This thread is full of them.
*wonders if blaccbeard will call this out as a racist post
It's funny that so many posters complain about racism having been redefined to include any criticism of minorities. From the war room I've actually learned the exact opposite. From my discussions with posters here I've learned the following aren't racist or aren't indicative of racist views:
-completely sharing David Duke's views on race
-sharing racial views with neo-nazis
-viewing particular ethnic groups as inherently inferior
-regularly using racial slurs
-supporting segregation
-opposing inter-racial relationships
-believing antebellum racial stereotypes
-suggesting that african-americans were better off under slavery
"Non-racists" in the war room have vehemently objected to being labeled racist for doing the above (and more). I guess, therefore, none of the above are indicative of being racist. What else could it be?
Except we know that structural and historical impediments to success differ among racial and economic groups. Now if you want to increase the inheritance tax to 100% and massively reorganize society, maybe your ideal can be realized. That's not going to happen though.they do.....
Oh look. Another sweeping, blanched complaint with no reference or citation of the alleged behavior. So much to work with here. BTW, wrong forum.I've been on Sherdog for a while and although i don't post as much as I used to I do lurk and I've never seen outright racism tolerated here like it has been over the last year or so.
As someone who has personally benefited from the discussions on this board I sincerely hope that the moderation here gets this under control some time soon...
The Sherfronters here would have you believe that the only real racists are the people who would label someone who supports all those views as racists.
I don't bookmark these things but all those things have gone on in the last year, including by some of the "non-racists" objecting to being labeled racists in this thread.I've literally never seen any of this on here. Can you quote posters?
I don't bookmark these things but all those things have gone on in the last year, including by some of the "non-racists" objecting to being labeled racists in this thread.
RIPWarrior is particularly bad but his threads get deleted regularly.
your kind have no abilities to actually discuss a topic so you think you win just because you throw out that name
i think the definition of racism has changed. now anything that doesnt take the side of minorities or does not paint them out as victims is considered racism.
Actually no, I wasn't thinking of you. I think you make some ignorant comments, like the assertion that chances to succeed are equal, but I don't actually recall anything clearly racist from you. I think the whole white male victim schtick is pretty pathetic and ignorant as well but not racist.well as the other racist in this thread, i would assume you mean me as well. can you recall where i did any of this? even if you are paraphrasing? because i disagree with every single thing on that list
Actually no, I wasn't thinking of you. I think you make some ignorant comments, like the assertion that chances to succeed are equal, but I don't actually recall anything clearly racist from you. I think the whole white male victim schtick is pretty pathetic and ignorant as well but not racist.
That's rich coming from the guy who just said this a couple of pages ago:
You're a walking, talking Stormfront post rerun. You share the same ideas and beliefs that the racist nutjobs on white nationalist websites do. You literally bring nothing to the table except to spew the same "the white man is under attack and minorities are taking over" bullshit. And then play the victim and go on the defense the second someone calls you out for the racist you are. Change the fucking record, no wonder why you and glennrod are such butt buddies, you are the exact same characters.
People should really think of your feelings before levying such blame.i dont think white males are victims at all. i object to people acting as if everything on earth is my fault (as a white male)
That's rich coming from the guy who just said this a couple of pages ago:
You're a walking, talking Stormfront post rerun. You share the same ideas and beliefs that the racist nutjobs on white nationalist websites do. You literally bring nothing to the table except to spew the same "the white man is under attack and minorities are taking over" bullshit. And then play the victim and go on the defense the second someone calls you out for the racist you are. Change the fucking record, no wonder why you and glennrod are such butt buddies, you are the exact same characters.
People should really think of your feelings before levying such blame.
Reports about bad ads should include the following:
1. Location/Country
2. Device
3. Browser
4. Company/Product of ad
5. A screenshot if possible
6. Brief description of how the ad is a problem
7. Page/Pages affected8. Date and time of occurrence
Refer to the instructions for your device on how to take screenshots