certainly more interesting than blurry distorted images of geese
Isn't loch Ness cold as fuck?
Fascinating stuff. As a keep fisher myself I can't say I ever seen a lake monster, but its very interesting. I have caught a few weird looking small fish before though.
Didn't they already scan the shit out of the lake and find nothing? We have the tech to figure this out. Deep ocean is a different story.
These creatures are exposing themselves above the water. Too many eyewitnesses describe the same thing. Definitely not a sturgeon.
This is the best non photoshopped picture of champ
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_reported_lake_monsters
They seem to be able to withstand the cold temperatures in Northern parts of the world.
About that, until late 1700 this gigantic thing was in nordic seas
Steller's sea cow (Hydrodamalis gigas) is an extinct sirenian discovered by Europeans in 1741. At that time, it was found only around the Commander Islands in the Bering Sea between Alaska and Russia; its range was more extensive during the Pleistocene epoch, and it is possible that the animal and humans previously interacted. Eighteenth century adults would reach weights of 8–10 metric tons (8.8–11.0 short tons) and lengths up to 9 meters (30 ft).
Oh hell yeah!!. I love a relaxing day of fishing. Its such a good stress reliever and relaxing.
How much of the ocean have we explored?
https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/exploration.html
And he didn't say it was filmed in the trench, dummy.
I agree. It's very unlikely that anything that large could be hiding without being found. Similarly to my example of sturgeon vs. lake monsters, the concept of the Sasquatch makes sense if you don't imagine it to be a new creature. I mean, where would you possibly find large, hairy, animals that can walk upright, and live in the woods? Wait, we already have that. Bears can do exactly that.The idea that megalodon are hiding in the Marina Trench is as idiotic as the idea that Bigfoot is in the woods.
I agree. It's very unlikely that anything that large could be hiding without being found. Similarly to my example of sturgeon vs. lake monsters, the concept of the Sasquatch makes sense if you don't imagine it to be a new creature. I mean, where would you possibly find large, hairy, animals that can walk upright, and live in the woods? Wait, we already have that. Bears can do exactly that.
As a bit of a downer, however:
That bear was killed during a hunt. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedals_(bear)
Lol rent free. As always.
^ looks like somebody doesn't know what a LOCH is.
Hey genius, get to googling.
It was actually for the worse to allow Pedals to become comfortable around humans in the New Jersey suburbs. It was not a healthy lifestyle for a wild bear to be living. An animal should be living in its own natural habitat and eco. In the article this is not addressed in depth yet my educated guess is he would frighten people for food and people were offering it to him, people were just leaving food out for him, or he was consuming waste food out of trash cans. I do not support the killing of the bear, but rather I support punishing the humans who were playing with mother nature.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-did-hunters-kill-him/?utm_term=.485cdf8c95d4