- Joined
- May 14, 2008
- Messages
- 20,031
- Reaction score
- 6,790
How about the death penalty for politicians that wage unjust wars based on lies?
How about the death penalty for politicians that wage unjust wars based on lies?
For the record I'm ok with killing them too.Or opioid based pharmaceutical companies who kill more people than "drug dealers"
It would certainly be the bestest and bigliest bill of rights. Only the best rights. Like grab em by the pussy and such.
trump would've been dead by now and you'd have no one to worship
I didn't vote for him, nor do I care for him bud.
That graph seriously looks like you just created it on Mario Paint.
Great point, however, as someone else mentioned earlier, why only lock up/execute people if it'll serve as a crime deterrent? Do it for justice!
As for your second point, it probably hasn't served as a great deterrent because how often do we actually execute someone? Maybe it'd be a solid deterrent if we didn't have hundreds, if not thousands, sitting on Death Row for DECADES.
you have to control group with which to claim this. have we ever had a time when criminals were not threatened with the possibility of prison/jail?
meh. what good is a punishment that just ends someone? they arent around to be punished.
the dead dont experience punishment. the lead up to it is no fun, i imagine, but that lasts what? days? hours? minutes? who knows. hell, it may even be something they look forward to.
i can understand why loved ones may want to killer their loved one's killer. but the chance that they may kill an innocent imo, is enough reason to do away with it. if you allow your vengeful sentiments to kill someone who was no more guilty than your loved one, what does that say about you?
What good is it to have them around? why should we pay the bills to keep them alive?
So its better to lock up an innocent for life, rather than accidentally execute them?
Remember that you said locking up for life was the worse punishment.
what is wrong with fucking porn stars?How about the death penalty for politicians who lie and fuck porn stars?
then let me ask you this, let's say 10 of your neighbors didn't want to pay to keep these people alive, would it be alright for you to pay the share of these ten people and possibly lower your own standard of living, would you still feel the same way?i dont think a justification for killing citizens should be "because its cheaper."
at least there is a chance of them being exonerated. cant revive the dead.
then let me ask you this, let's say 10 of your neighbors didn't want to pay to keep these people alive, would it be alright for you to pay the share of these ten people and possibly lower your own standard of living, would you still feel the same way?
And you didn't tell me what good it was to keep these people alive.
there is an appeals process for a reason
you are basically putting the needs of one over the needs of many
there is an automatic appeal if someone is sentenced to death, so that cost is there no matter what. If it were pennies i wouldn't really care, somehow it costs around 40 to 50 K per year to keep an inmate jailed.right. and the appeals process generally costs more than life in prison. so if its a penny pinching issue for you, then just lock them up.
there is an automatic appeal if someone is sentenced to death, so that cost is there no matter what.
I believe that this is the part where right wingers adapt and say that Trump was originally a Dem and was a RINO all along and this is a fault of his liberal New York upbringing and valuesRepublican that's pro big government and anti personal freedom.
Color me shocked.