Difference being my guns don't do anything without me handling them. Pitbulls are the exact opposite.
Its not any different though...Pitbulls aren't sovereign citizens.
They are owned, contained, and handed by an owner. Bad things only happen to innocent bystanders when the owners or handlers of both are irresponsible or did not take the appropriate measures. Or when both use them for nefarious reasons.
If you want to talk about the obvious differences though, don't skip over the ASTRONOMICAL delta in deaths or violent attacks via gun vs the tiny # of "pitbull" deaths a year. Or how ridiculously more fatal a gun attack is vs a domesticated K9 attack.
You absolutely decimated him with that response
Nah, only to goofy people who feel they can tell others what weapons they can't own but cry when other people try to tell them what dangerous deadly weapons they also shouldn't own.
"None for thee but all for meeee"
Again I agree with all of your classifications of labeling them as a deadly weapon. This was your own classification.
Its scary because it sounds like most of you should not own guns too. One of the biggest things they teach you with gun safety & responsibilities is to secure your weapon.
Why is that???? Because if you leave your gun out or unsecured it will fall into the hands of an irresponsible criminal or handler. So this whole notion of "my gun can't harm anyone without my say so" is comical.
Its another case of cherry picking and ignoring real world statistics. How many murders or violent attacks are committed with stolen or found firearms??? Bet its more than Pitbull werewolf homicides. Lol