Interesting considering the timing of the court.
What stops the UK from pulling out if Brexit and then invoking Article 50 once again? And again and again until they get the results they desire?
UK should stay with the EU. It will be better for them.
52 > 48. All noise to try and ice you into another vote because the first one didn't go as planned. Get it done.
52 > 48. All noise to try and ice you into another vote because the first one didn't go as planned. Get it done.
I couldn't make it through 2 mins of that video.
.. and? Do you have a short attention span or are you not able to view content presenting opposing viewpoints? It's a rant against the anti-democratic nonsense surrounding brexit. Nothing more nor less.
I got to the point where he said that those who opposed brexit oppose the existence of the UK. That suggests that it is indeed a rant and one not worth taking seriously.
I would also like to point to the fact that us leaving the UK is much likelier to break up after leaving the EU than remaining (look at the absolute shitfest in NI).
Isn't something as important like that, letting EU set quotas for importing third worlders into the UK, essentially a deal that overrides Brexit and it's ideas (they, not EU decide their own laws/border controls). How can you be "out of the EU" yet EU controls you in this way?
How on earth anyone thought she was ms Hard Brexit? Clever marketing?
Right, two face politician, but there was nothing to indicate from her she didn't want that image as she was the one at the helm to deliver what people voted for. She even talked tough, so some people believed it lol.No one thought she was Mrs hard brexit though , she was and is a Remainer at heart not her fault all the visionary types that lead the leave campaign have done nothing more productive than snipe from the sidelines since the vote .
Right, two face politician, but there was nothing to indicate from her she didn't want that image as she was the one at the helm to deliver what people voted for. She even talked tough, so some people believed it lol.
That is a hardly the main talking point of my post though, just a point at her scheming ways. UK cannot sign this thing and leave the EU, complete with needing to make their own Bill of Rights, because they're not in the EU anymore. It is politically incongruous to sign something that directly affects how they control the border.
1 Referendum Voted to Leave (in order to no longer adhere to EU mandates, border control etc.)
2 Signs Migration Pact during Brexit process - showing their hand they welcome third world.
3 Leaves EU officially
4 Adheres to importing third world and what EU has decided for your border.
Ok so what was the point in the referendum? People who say that "it's not legally binding" as some sort of indication that the powers that be don't like/want it is laughable. This shows don't intend to deliver Brexit at all, and don't respect democracy. Leave means Leave.
Brexit?1 Referendum Voted to Leave (in order to no longer adhere to EU mandates, border control etc.)
** It was advisory and non binding
No commonwealth member has any authority over another.2 Signs Migration Pact during Brexit process - showing their hand they welcome third world.
**The UK has more immigrants from the Commonwealth than from the EU, guess where they're coming from ?
They can negotiate as hard as they want. They still have to leave.3 Leaves EU officially
** But still wants to keep all the benefits because a hard Brexit is suicidal.
This whattaboutism does not show reasons to support signing the migration pact.** Like places in the Commonwealth and NI also had a referendum in 1998 and choose not to have a border with Ireland.
I don't think this helps your argument. Just goes to show how much of an imbecile Cameron was/is. There is no doubt people were ill-informed on Northern Ireland. That is not the fault of the voters, there was no pamphlet describing "what will happen legally with the border in NI", there should have been. There were adverts about how voting is racist though.That's because when we have referendums, it's planned for 2 years in advance of the vote, every household receives a booklet outlining what will happen legally and constitutionally before the vote, so we have all the facts.