- Joined
- Oct 6, 2003
- Messages
- 4,113
- Reaction score
- 0
You sound like a broken record chanting child soldier as if that's defence for murder and terrorism. Under international law he is an illegal combatant, wearing no uniform and representing no country. All he represented was Islamic jihadism under Al-Qaeda's banners. His admission of guilt was made before a court of law, and he . For the record, he could have complained about being "tortured" like you said to the trial judge. He's not appealing anything and he certainly isn't getting anything overturned. Quit presenting shit you made up as facts.
He was shot after he threw the grenade that killed the American soldier. The air strike did not kill the terrorists he was with, and they still offered resistance after the bomb was dropped. He was not buried like you claimed, instead he was found crouching down when he was shot. He deserved every bit of it. Both the Taliban and Al-Qaeda have significant amount of American made ammunition, due to supplies they received from CIA and Pakistan in the 1980's. All of your excuses for this waste of human skin collapses in the face of reality.
I love how you are still dodging the question. Since you claimed that he was resisting foreign occupation, what country was he fighting for? Answer the question. Nobody likes a dishonest coward.
Still lying about the basic facts of the cases, huh? Tell me something, if he wasn't a child soldier but rather a "murdering terrorist," why did a US Military Commissinon only give him 8 years? What other terrorist with blood on their hands got off with 8 years?
Game. Set. Match.