- Joined
- Oct 30, 2017
- Messages
- 3,409
- Reaction score
- 0
I've never seen a happy leftist.
Constantly tilting at windmills is exhausting work. You'd be a hate filled whack job, too.
I've never seen a happy leftist.
What's a better descriptor for this then?
If you're from STL, you can read over my posts and deduce what neighborhood by my descriptions of it. Also not white.
If you don't like conflict theory, get into what you don't or even do like about the theory. Don't equate every far left progressive as supporting conflict theory, don't equate conflict theory as Marxism, don't equate the entire "leftist" segment with Marxism. And if you do, at least admit you are giving us the brietbart dictionary and not a real definition.
I lived in Stl for almost 10 years. Bevo, Lafayette Square and TGS. I don't read enough of your posts to deduce anything about where you live. Also, Stl is full of self loathing whites whether you're white or not doesn't change that as I'm sure you've noticed the same, no ? I live in Town and Country now. Much better.
I live in one of your previous stomping grounds.
I really don't know what a "self loathing white person" is. I mean, I know what a self-loathing person in general is, but I have no idea why their being white is meaningful. I certainly haven't noticed St. Louis people being any different than those in Chicago or Baltimore.
Tower Grove... I'd guess.
I lived on Humphrey for a couple of years. By Tower Pub. Miss living in Lafayette Square a bit. The park was super nice. Used to see a fox occasionally. Owls.
Yeah, that's a nice, convenient area to live. I have a couple colleagues that have bought houses there. Even for a pretty economically diverse and integrated south city, it's pretty crazy how it has expensive old French-style homes populated by yuppies right next to the blocks of subsidized housing populated by poor folks. It's crazier when compared to the economic and racial segregation of North City and the County.
Much larger? By what measure? Any data I have seen shows rather starkly the continuing rise of far-right activists while the far left appears to be no more than a pimple on the political ass of the nation. I'm mainly basing this off the statistics showing that far right terror plots greatly outnumber those of far left groups and that the gap continues to widen.It's hard to say because the terms are sometimes interchanged by people.
As with most people they are a mixture depending on the issue. Most people are center left or center right and weave back and forth across the line.
We do see a growing number on the left that push all the way to the far left to become regressive left.
So you end up with alt right and alt left. The alt or regressive left being much larger then the alt right.
Much larger? By what measure? Any data I have seen shows rather starkly the continuing rise of far-right activists while the far left appears to be no more than a pimple on the political ass of the nation. I'm mainly basing this off the statistics showing that far right terror plots greatly outnumber those of far left groups and that the gap continues to widen.
It's hard to say because the terms are sometimes interchanged by people.
As with most people they are a mixture depending on the issue. Most people are center left or center right and weave back and forth across the line.
You didn't answer the question. By what measure do you, specifically, judge "the alt or regressive left being much larger then the alt right" to be a true statement? I told you one of the reasons I make the opposite judgement. I have more, but let's hear your justification for that assertion before we move on.So like I said it depends on what you call far right and far left.
Why would you base it off terror plots and how do you classife far right and far left.
Got to get to work, be back latter.
No, I think you're right.I'm surprised someone actually identified as a Leftist unironically itt.
My impression was always that it was a term used to describe the straw people who hold together all most wily mischaracterizations of non-conservative positions.
In other words, I typically ignore it. But maybe I'm wrong.
Let us know how it goes, but remember, pics or it didn't happen.I wonder if her butthole hair is blue also
You didn't answer the question. By what measure do you, specifically, judge "the alt or regressive left being much larger then the alt right" to be a true statement? I told you one of the reasons I make the opposite judgement. I have more, but let's hear your justification for that assertion before we move on.
Gee, 'collage' students are touchy about their inchoate identities? Who'd have thought? Why that's the foundation of liberalism.If you go by pure numbers of people voting age that view issues from a far left or very left compare them to far right or very right you see the larger number with the left.
Look at collages and things like supporting allowing boy in the girls showers and the support this gets.
That is far left. Far right is the hell with trans there should be nothing for them and they should be in jail.
Now look at the numbers each way.
Now this is my view and this will all change with who you ask.
If you ask plenty of people on the left anyone that doesn't be live a man that says they are female and allowed to use or go anywhere a females does if an alt right racist.
Gee, 'collage' students are touchy about their inchoate identities? Who'd have thought? Why that's the foundation of liberalism.
This is why it so goddam difficult to discuss anything with right wingers bc practically all your arguments are emotional, sadistic, inaccurate drivel.
The angle of conflict theory they're applying is not in economic terms fundamentally. That's what you're not appreciating. The angle they're exploiting is on racial and gender terms, which is applied on campuses and extrapolated to society abroad. Instead of the working class uniting against the capitalist class, now its women, trans, gay, and POC uniting against whitey.
Except for some brainwashed dinosaurs like you (no disrespect intended), no one tries to make arguments for Marxism on economic grounds any more.