hi updowniri,
aye, i hear ya.
- IGIT
What an embarrassing response.
I post a thread detailing how the
government ignores public and private discrimination against whites, but comes down hard on private and public discrimination against other races. I provide examples of major companies openly discriminating against whites and getting away with it. I provide examples of iffy at best discrimination against blacks being shut down by the government.
You counter this by putting up statistics of black people
performing less well then white people in a variety of areas.
This is irrelevant. On paper there is no law that mandates that every race must have equal representation per capita in every activity or occupation. There is however a law that bans discrimination against a race in the hiring process. Citing black people not having equal representation per capita in various activities or occupations. Is not a valid justification for allowing discrimination against white people.
You counter this by insinuating that, in fact, all of the lower levels of performance among black people must be due discrimination.
Therefore, black people not having equal representation per capita in various activities or occupations is equal to discrimination against black people.
Therefore, black people not having equal representation per capita in various activities or occupations is the equivalent to the modern day discrimination against white people.
Therefore, white people stop complaining, black people have the same problem to.
Me and other people in this thread easily retort this argument by providing various possible and
probable explanations for blacks lower performance other then discrimination. Even when controlling for something like a college degree. We then point out that white people not getting money from a
black people only government business relief fund can only be explained by racism.
Finally we hit you with the hammer. We site various other instances of whites under performing in certain areas. Mockingly, we ask if this is also the result of discrimination.
Your response? You completely break. In order to save your pathetic argument you concede that, yes, in fact, something like white people being underrepresented in the NBA, must be the result of discrimination against whites.
Of course actually believing that would cause you to betray your liberal stance, and also out you as delusional. So you make sure to add various comic book like descriptions of your thinking process and an obvious and overwhelming sarcastic tone. To let everyone know that you really don't think that something like white people being underrepresented in the NBA, must be the result of discrimination against whites.
Now you can have it both ways. In order to conjure up phantom cases of unpunished discrimination against blacks, you feign sympathy for all instances of races being underrepresented in an activity or occupation. As they must be being discriminated against according to you. But also let everyone know, through your tone, that while you do believe that poor black performance is caused by discrimination against blacks, poor white performance being caused by discrimination against whites is laughable. When called out on your ridiculous "debate strategy" you feign sincerity.
At any rate I cut right through that and just told you I don't care about performance or discrimination. I let you know that my main gripe is that the
government bans discrimination against blacks while allowing it against whites. This bothers me more then unequal performance among blacks and whites. And this also bothers me more then discrimination against blacks and whites. The fact that
you are allowed to discriminate against whites but not allowed to discriminate against blacks is, quite literally, the discrimination of discrimination, and it is my main problem.
What do you do? You crop out the "I don't care" sentence from my very logical retort. And make a mocking accusation that I must be a bad person for not caring about black peoples problems. The end all be all of liberal debating. "You don't care about black people." "Your a racist."
But honestly now that I get to the end of typing all of this, I think I should take back what I said at the beginning. That was not really an embarrassing response. You did in fact debate me and the other right wingers here. You responded to points in our posts and replied with your own. Your arguments got progressively worse the more we exposed them, but that is too be expected. Honestly, now that I look at it, you went in the the debate bravely, tried your best, and lost. No shame in that.
You debated much more honorably then the dozens of other left wingers in this thread spamming one sentence mockeries of anti white discrimination to every right wing post. But, seeing as what happened to you when you tried to engage, who can really blame them for playing that strategy?