Social Google employee's anti-diversity Manifesto getting in-house support

[Liquid Smoke]

The War Room's favorite psych professor just challenged Google's Diversity VP to a public debate.

 

[HomerThompson]

 

[AviatorShades]

I support a diversity doctrine at Google. Google is a scary monopolistic company with heavily involved in surveillance and bogging them with diversity could be crippling blow they need.

 

[Offended]

First two sentences, yes. The rest of the post is your ish, and, in any case, irrelevant to the point at hand.

Yup.

Those retards.

Those retards who made Google...

That thing you and everyone you know uses numerous times every day...

i use bing bitch.

So did you chop your dick off yet to become uber left.

 

[luckyshot]

So what you're saying is if an employer decided it wanted to hire only straight, white, males, you're all for it? Or is that not how this works?

Personally, idgaf (I'm a straight white male).

In theory, people shouldn't be discriminated against for any reason.

But we all know this isn't how reality works. Nine times out of ten the chick with the good cans gets the porn gig, know what I mean?

i use bing bitch.

So did you chop your dick off yet to become uber left.

OK. You use bing. That totally invalidates my point. I stand corrected. Google is run by a bunch of retards.

 

[SensaiRambo]

Let me see... is google doing OK these days?

Yeah?

Then I guess they're entitled to hold whatever corporate views on diversity they want.

And employees who don't like it are entitled to stfu or get a new gig. Or in this case, accept their counseling like a good little cuck.

Conservatives love corporate rights, until a corporation adopts a view they don't like.

I love how conservatives bitch about how liberal these big tech companies are... Google, Facebook, YouTube, etc.

Here's a question: if they don't like it, why don't conservatives make their own tech companies that don't suck?

I thought liberals loved the trust busting? Couldn't you argue that FDR and Taft, both political nemeses, would have gone after tech giants in today's world?

 

[Cirris]

I support a diversity doctrine at Google. Google is a scary monopolistic company with heavily involved in surveillance and bogging them with diversity could be crippling blow they need.

It depends on what "diversity" you're thinking of. The only diversity progressives like to have these days is the diversity of skin tone and genitals. It's painful how progressives can't stand differing viewpoints of ideologies unless it falls into the skin tone or gender range. Then in the appearance of being diverse they ignore the differing viewpoints of certain skin tones and genders, while admonishing another group for similar ideals.

--------------------

The funny thing is they don't release the name of the author of this manifesto.

In the back of my mind I'm thinking, 'No white male hired at Google would even think of writing this Memo in the political climate in San Fran Bay area.'

If it was, he probably would already have been outed by colleagues and blacklisted.

My gut instinct is telling my he was Asian/Indian. Someone who wouldn't fear getting pitchforked for his skin tone over his controversial writing.

--------------------

/side rant

i use bing bitch.

So did you chop your dick off yet to become uber left.

I tried using Duck Duck Go(DDG) for awhile. But it's data mining algorithms aren't that good compared to Google. So the searches seem to fall flat and sparsely populated.

You just lose too much efficiency with DDG to have piece of mind that some conglomerate isn't toying with your search results.

/end side rant

 

[Burning Hammer]

Not saying I know exactly what goes on in Google not liking/discriminating against employees with right leaning ideas. But I know 100% about it.

 

[IDL]

I bet he wasn't complaining about the abilities of the male Indian and Asian minority engineers though...

They don't need social engineering projects and 'diversity officers' to get jobs. They are pretty well represented in programming fields.

 

[Lord Coke]

 

[Satsui Ryu]

A guy who writes 10 pages on identity politics? Can't help but think he is a white guy with yellow fever who is "too nice" to get girls and his sexual frustration drives him to take that much time to write stuff like this.

 

[Ice That Jaw]

This isnt just Google. Out of the dozen or so people I interviewed for developer interns this summer, only 1 of them was a male. The girls interviewed well and had impressive GPAs but, the HR at my company was clearly targeting a quota of some sort.

 

[AviatorShades]

It depends on what "diversity" you're thinking of. The only diversity progressives like to have these days is the diversity of skin tone and genitals. It's painful how progressives can't stand differing viewpoints of ideologies unless it falls into the skin tone or gender range. Then in the appearance of being diverse they ignore the differing viewpoints of certain skin tones and genders, while admonishing another group for similar ideals.

--------------------

The funny thing is they don't release the name of the author of this manifesto.

In the back of my mind I'm thinking, 'No white male hired at Google would even think of writing this Memo in the political climate in San Fran Bay area.'

If it was, he probably would already have been outed by colleagues and blacklisted.

My gut instinct is telling my he was Asian/Indian. Someone who wouldn't fear getting pitchforked for his skin tone over his controversial writing.

--------------------

/side rant



I tried using Duck Duck Go(DDG) for awhile. But it's data mining algorithms aren't that good compared to Google. So the searches seem to fall flat and sparsely populated.

You just lose too much efficiency with DDG to have piece of mind that some conglomerate isn't toying with your search results.

/end side rant

Of course. "Diversity" is one of those words we've long since detached from its formal/dictionary definition, just like "progressive" or "social justice".

They love to hijack glorious-sounding terms, cheapen them with extremist redefinitions until they're borderline profanity.

Those poor 10 year olds who wonder how anyone could be against stuff like progress, justice and diversity (aka 18th century economics, petty vandalism and third-world overpopulation).

 

[godking]

From the autist's manifesto:

Status is the primary metric that men are judged on, pushing many men into these higher paying, less satisfying jobs for the status that they entail. Note, the same forces that lead men into high pay/high stress jobs in tech and leadership cause men to take undesirable and dangerous jobs like coal mining, garbage collection, and firefighting, and suffer 93% of work-related deaths.

What a fucking maroon.

Status for good and for ill is what men are judged on.

You are for good and for ill essentially your job.

 

[mon]

this is a link to the actual post the guy wrote

http://gizmodo.com/exclusive-heres-...utm_source=motherboard.vice.com-RelayMediaAMP

Congratulations, this was a superb link. Rarely does something convey such a blend of left ideals with a right leaning

 

[mon]

As far as I am aware, there are federal non-discrimination laws, like title vii, but I am not aware of any federal "diversity laws" that impose hiring quotas.

Source?

Edit: Waiting...

How did school change soooo drastically except boys' behavior deteriorated?
School in the 50's and 60's involved sitting still on your ass for long periods of time with your mouth shut taking notes, then going home to do your homework reading-- the types of practices that are considered "unfair" to boys today.

This is from a leading chick(oh the horror, you can't say chick in 2017....)

https://www.gizmodo.com.au/2017/01/professors-horror-at-australias-feminised-physics-curriculum/

 

[mon]

What's his job? Software designer? I think he should probably design software.

If he wants to pop off at the mouth, cool, but if Google doesn't like it, and he's out of a job, my heart won't break for him.

If I am an employer I can hire whoever the fuck I want. And if you as an employee don't like it, your remedy is right over there (I'm pointing at the door).

It seems a fairly simple concept.

The point is as an employer you can't as the previous poster illustrated due to the anti discrimination laws which only work like a one way street.

 

[mon]

A guy who writes 10 pages on identity politics? Can't help but think he is a white guy with yellow fever who is "too nice" to get girls and his sexual frustration drives him to take that much time to write stuff like this.

OR he/she(possibly) is just sick to death of the bullshit crippling his industry and destroying common sense and statistics.......

 

[Thunderflash500]

Let me see... is google doing OK these days?

Yeah?

Then I guess they're entitled to hold whatever corporate views on diversity they want.

And employees who don't like it are entitled to stfu or get a new gig. Or in this case, accept their counseling like a good little cuck.

Conservatives love corporate rights, until a corporation adopts a view they don't like.

I love how conservatives bitch about how liberal these big tech companies are... Google, Facebook, YouTube, etc.

Here's a question: if they don't like it, why don't conservatives make their own tech companies that don't suck?

Typical liberal authoritarian. Accept our utopia or stfu. Have your own thoughts? Dont want to hear them. Why is so wrong for him to have an opinion? You think corparations want drones? Unthinking yes men?

 

[ehtheist]

Let me see... is google doing OK these days?

Yeah?

Then I guess they're entitled to hold whatever corporate views on diversity they want.

And employees who don't like it are entitled to stfu or get a new gig. Or in this case, accept their counseling like a good little cuck.

Conservatives love corporate rights, until a corporation adopts a view they don't like.

I love how conservatives bitch about how liberal these big tech companies are... Google, Facebook, YouTube, etc.

Here's a question: if they don't like it, why don't conservatives make their own tech companies that don't suck?

What's with the whole "Oh, have an opinion, do you? YOU'RE LUCKY TO HAVE A JOB CONSERVATIVE SCUM! Now shut up, do your job, and dare ye not to criticize!" routine? You really didn't waste any time going full sprint with the vitriol and it's turning into a marathon. From what I've read you're one step shy of suggesting the guy be deported to Russia where he'll be happier or something.