Just seeing the headlines, it looked like the guy choked him for 15 minutes? How does someone not know that that's likely going to kill them? And he was out long before he died.
If you don't try to shove people on to train tracks, you probably won't be choked to death. Of course, now there will be people crying for this guy despite the fact he tried to essentially kill someone.
Crazy people should not be excused and just released back into the public after committing crimes over and over. They weren't normal yesterday and just turned crazy and went on a crime rampage all in 1 day, by the time these people make the news for something horrific, there are about 50 things they should have already been put away for.
Warning signs, red flags, etc.Crazy people should not be excused and just released back into the public after committing crimes over and over. They weren't normal yesterday and just turned crazy and went on a crime rampage all in 1 day, by the time these people make the news for something horrific, there are about 50 things they should have already been put away for.
If you don't try to shove people on to train tracks, you probably won't be choked to death. Of course, now there will be people crying for this guy despite the fact he tried to essentially kill someone.
Okay.
Well, my point is more that conflating criminal behaviour with mental illness is something that works at times, but then equally, it's treated like it doesn't have to work when it doesn't suit.
Someone is obviously mentally ill if they gun down a bunch of people, or are trying to push people in front of trains. But mental illness isn't a permanent state of being.
I wouldn't agree with any comments AT ALL that people with mental health issues (which can range from anxiety to schizophrenia and beyond) 'shouldn't be free' just because it suits a particular narrative (ie, avoiding gun laws and restrictions).
It's very weak to argue that gun laws and restrictions aren't needed 'just because some people have mental health issues', but then imply those people deserve to die because they're so violent and dangerous.
Like, what sense does that make?
No, I'm not. It's the job of the government to keep its people safe. But when they neglect to do their jobs, someone will fill that void. What's being missed here is that due to New York's negligence, if this guy was still alive, there is a very good chance he would eventually wind up killing an innocent person. The blood would be on the governments hands, but of course they would never admit any blame or take any accountability.He was shoving people onto the train tracks WHILE being on the train himself?
Or are you making the claim that its ok to kill someone for the crimes they've allegedly committed in the past?
great post.
I think you are one of the few who honestly and effectively adds nuance to conversations like this.
No, I'm not. It's the job of the government to keep its people safe. But when they neglect to do their jobs, someone will fill that void. What's being missed here is that due to New York's negligence, if this guy was still alive, there is a very good chance he would eventually wind up killing an innocent person. The blood would be on the governments hands, but of course they would never admit any blame or take any accountability.
This guy should not have been walking the streets by himself. He was a danger to himself and others.
He was shoving people onto the train tracks WHILE being on the train himself?
Or are you making the claim that its ok to kill someone for the crimes they've allegedly committed in the past?
I agree, the support for the homeless and mentally ill lacking in America. We should vote for legislation so that people like this get help they need, instead of being killed by misguided vigilantes.
Thanks, I'll look him up. These people are wackadoo.and this is exactly right. you have so many white savior types, who try so hard to "unique" or part of a group that they deem "marginalized" to give their pathetic lives meaning.
look at Tonto Pete's post history as well. just 100 percent textbook, white savior syndrome, revisionist history and defending criminals
I seriously doubt he was cranking for the full 15 minutes. are you arguing that he intentionally tried to kill him?
@Jack V Savage disappointing to see you "like" this terrible, dishonest post.
no one here is arguing killing people, or locking folks up simply because they are mentally unwell.
we are arguing that this man was a violent criminal with a history of offenses.
Like George Floyd?i heard he died from fentanyl tbh
I don't understand how you hold a RNC for that long without the awareness you just might kill the person. That said there was a good chance the crazy dude was going to kill someone at some point. The guy was trying to push people in front of trains coming, that's a severely ill person.
Speaking of ill people...
A FYI for sherdoggers @skold is on dubs right now for threating another member and dropping the n word with the hard "R" in the same post... Also I'll add he just got off of dubs for a couple weeks prior to getting right back on them. He has a mountain of issues.
Yeah any sympathy I would have had, was lost at "he tried to push someone onto the tracks"these "good riddance" comments are in response to the fact that this guy has 40 arrests, and active warrant for felony assault, not to mention he attempted to shove someone on the train tracks.
no where was there a comment like, "oh, he's crazy? let's put him down."
that post was 100 percent dishonest, as is that shit poster.