- Joined
- Dec 20, 2009
- Messages
- 11,493
- Reaction score
- 1
Someting about a bunch of dudes who would rather hang out with each other than women not sitting right with you, bro?
YEAH!
Someting about a bunch of dudes who would rather hang out with each other than women not sitting right with you, bro?
You seem to make reasonable points but I feel like the general reaction to what you're saying by wider society is still that you play the game no matter how rigged it may seem or how dubious the spoils. It's just "the way it is"
Not sure how much I've ever agreed with blind acceptance of the status quo, however.
You're choosing to form a support group with the specific purpose of avoiding women. You're defining yourself by the female gender.
Also if you need to avoid women to "focus on yourself" then that means you arent focusing on yourself while in a relationship. You're being subservient, aka a beta.
You know what I do when I'm in a relationship? The exact same things I do when I'm single. Work out, go out to bars, hang out with my friends, go hiking, camping, traveling etc. A female has never came between me and my interests. And if you can't figure out how to do this you are approaching relationships the wrong way. They are supposed to be enhancements to an already awesome life, not the building block to a crappy one.
And when I'm not dating? I just call that being single. No need to form a support group, no need to rant to other bitter losers about how women have been holding me down.
Bitter loser huh? I still don't see why you guys are getting in a twist over this. If you don't like it, ignore it. No need to come in trying to vehemently decry a philosophy that's a little different than your own. That along with the name calling reeks of insecurity to me.You're choosing to form a support group with the specific purpose of avoiding women. You're defining yourself by the female gender.
Also if you need to avoid women to "focus on yourself" then that means you arent focusing on yourself while in a relationship. You're being subservient, aka a beta.
You know what I do when I'm in a relationship? The exact same things I do when I'm single. Work out, go out to bars, hang out with my friends, go hiking, camping, traveling etc. A female has never came between me and my interests. And if you can't figure out how to do this you are approaching relationships the wrong way. They are supposed to be enhancements to an already awesome life, not the building block to a crappy one.
And when I'm not dating? I just call that being single. No need to form a support group, no need to rant to other bitter losers about how women have been holding me down.
I divorced in 2010 and had a pretty awful experience with the courts. I'm just taking a break from dating and my exgirlfriend. No desire to ever marry again.@Robocok I'll have to go back and read but trying to salvage your marriage every couple of months is worth the effort.
There's something to say for being hand tied to someone for better or worse. You're getting the worst of her and you can't abandon it, how you handle the situation could really lead to the most significant growth based relationship you'll ever have.
How about the family court system? Taking away half your stuff in the event of divorce and losing custody of the kids? That's what I'm concerned about.Here's my take on the mgtow thing from an attachment theory and cognitive perspective:
-> As the child the man receives poor parenting, perhaps especially from his mother.
-> As a result, he develops an insecure attachment style, most likely preoccupied or fearful-avoidant, which is a negative mental object representation of others as unable to meet his needs. But perhaps especially he develops a negative representation of women (based on the mother).
-> As an adult, he searches for partners which verify his pre-existing beliefs about himself (self-verification) and repeats the early traumatic pattern.
-> This translates into picking a woman who can't give him the love he needs e.g. a woman with a dismissing attachment, a toxic woman.
-> He acts in a meek and subservient fashion during the relationship, gives up his needs to accommodate his partner, as is typical for an anxiously attached person. He becomes unhappy.
-> Predictably, the relationship explodes. Every negative experience strengthens his schema of "women are bad, women are evil, women are unfair," etc. Every individual has a different version of the schema.
-> It eventually culminates into a schema coping mode called surrender. The man surrenders himself to the schema, despite it being very painful, and accepts it as true instead of fighting it "Women are bad, I can't do anything about it. All I do is stay alone and accept my fate."
Every person will be mgtow for a different "reason" (reason that is consciously known), but I bet you that this general path is very common
Bitter loser huh? I still don't see why you guys are getting in a twist over this. If you don't like it, ignore it. No need to come in trying to vehemently decry a philosophy that's a little different than your own. That along with the name calling reeks of insecurity to me.
If you can be in a relationship and not get entangled in your girlfriend's drama and mindgames, good for you, but I like to take a break from all that bullshit from time to time and I definitely don't need to get married or have kids.
You're offended because other guys don't want to get married and prefer to go their own way? Again, it sounds pretty insecure. You should be less preoccupied by how others perceive you. There's more to life.Beta male groups personally offend me because it reflects badly in my gender. You guys need to grow up. If a bad relationship is the worst life has thrown you then you are a sheltered individual who has experienced nothing yet.
You're offended because other guys don't want to get married and prefer to go their own way? Again, it sounds pretty insecure. You should be less preoccupied by how others perceive you. There's more to life.
Also, not seeing my son for 3 months and then having to fight for the right to spend time with him, while not the worst thing that could happen, was still terrible and not unworthy of complaint.
Ha, I never asked for your sympathy dude. In my experience, all women play mind games. I'm not swearing them off personally, at least not forever, but I don't understand the stigma of a guy who chooses to do that and focus on himself instead. All I hear from you is a bunch of shaming language like weak, subservient, beta, embarrassing...No, I'm offended that there's a group of weak-willed, subservient males that are so emotionally emotionally disturbed they have to publicly declare they are swearing off women and "focusing on their own life." This is embarrassing behavior and focusing on your own life is something you should always be doing, regardless of dating.
You can't choose your family. But you can choose the kind of people you hang around. Two of the biggest decisions you will make in your life: marriage and kids. And you chose to do them with a drama prone women who plays mind games. You chose to be subservient to her. You'll get no sympathy from me.
Lets say someone is a bisexual and they swear off women but continue to pursue men, would that person be considered a MGTOW or is MGTOW about full on celibacy rather than just swearing off romantic relationships with women.
He got 16 toes!MGTOW?
like Midget tow?
I Would say a MGTOW is swearing off Relationships/ Marriage. I'm Bisexual and currently don't date in general, How ever I don't see myself ever dating a woman seriously again;
If casual sex comes easily my way, great but I won't put effort into pursuing them. Anything a woman can offer me a man can give me with higher quality.
I think I could only be MGTOW if I had a weak dick and didnt care about not getting laid
The fact is when you are good looking and you have a good dick, you should be getting laid as much as possible, and you should feel frustrated when you are not getting laid
The thing is many men want children and want to do so in a nuclear family setting for the sake of raising properly socialized children.
It is worth noting that the "traditional" nuclear family is a fairly recent invention in itself -- post industrial revolution in fact. Men of the per-industrial times would introduce their wives into their household which included their parents and siblings. His parents/siblings would have his best interests in mind and would keep her balanced and help with the children.
Well I don't want to have kids, so it's easier for me.
Very good points about the nuclear family, if I'm not mistaken monogamous marriage is also fairly new. In ancient times, it was used more to ensure alliances with other people were not broken ; whether in business or war
Also, MGTOW doesn't have to involve immaturity, fear, and removal from the dating pool. I view it as simply living your life in a manner that best suits you, and not just following the herd of sheep headed for slaughter.
I think it goes far beyond feminism.I think it is the logical reaction to third wave feminism and "equality".
There are a lot of men who are victimized and marginalized in life and would rather throw in the towel than play along. C