- Joined
- Jul 28, 2010
- Messages
- 72,242
- Reaction score
- 52,022
Where are the Trumpbots with the integrity to admit they were WRONG?
About what?
Where are the Trumpbots with the integrity to admit they were WRONG?
If I had insisted repeatedly that my candidate had nothing to do with Russia, and it becomes clear that there's not much they WEREN'T doing with Russia, I'd be apologizing and admitting, "Turns out that was correct."About what?
If I had insisted repeatedly that my candidate had nothing to do with Russia, and it becomes clear that there's not much they WEREN'T doing with Russia, I'd be apologizing and admitting, "Turns out that was correct."
Well, if it's what you say, I love it! > TT meeting> Donald revises statement about meeting to say it was about "adoptions" >Mueller issuing subpoenas, West Wing lawyering upLOL, no you wouldn't. You guys can't even admit that the DOJ blatantly lied about wiretapping.
Anyways, what evidence is there that Trump had anything to do with Russia?
Well, if it's what you say, I love it! > TT meeting> Donald revises statement about meeting to say it was about "adoptions" >Mueller issuing subpoenas, West Wing lawyering up
*nothingburger cookout*
Starting the grill purty soon, bring an appetite for embarrassment
Flag the post so that we can review it after the indictments have been issued. Then we'll see who's right and who's burying his head in the sand.In other words, you've got nothing, and are in the same wishful fantasizing position you were in six months ago. Neat.
Keep putting us in our place, Dick Tracy.
Flag the post so that we can review it after the indictments have been issued. Then we'll see who's right and who's burying his head in the sand.
Are you at least able to admit that the known circumstances are shady as fuck?
I'm curious to hear the explanation that makes all the APPARENT collusion and subsequent cover up an innocent misunderstanding.
That'll be just fascinating logical gymnastics.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...263a2c-9fe2-11e7-8ea1-ed975285475e_story.html
Homeland security says the Russians didn't hack anything, it was all a mistake.
It may not reach Trump himself, but IMO you'd have to be fooling yourself by now to continue to maintain nothing happened.In the span of of three posts, you've gone from
"It definitely happened! Own up, Trumpsters!" to "Well, there was at least shady stuff"...LOL.
Quit arguing with emotions. It'll lessen the blow when everything you're wishing for, doesn't come true.
Seriously, you do realize that even under the worst case scenario, that "collusion" isn't even a crime, right? You are aware, that even if it comes to light that Trump himself was asking for dirt on Hillary from the Russians, that nothing is going to happen, right?
It may not reach Trump himself, but IMO you'd have to be fooling yourself by now to continue to maintain nothing happened.
The investigation isn't even complete.
My guess is, the mountain of evidence that's been uncovered *and admitted to in subsequent interviews* speaks to anyone paying attention that the tip of the iceberg has only been showing.
It's bad and it's gonna get significantly worse. Whichever way it goes, if he had been my guy I'd have regretted my vote long ago.
You're bizarrely detached from the investigation, it seems.What mountain of evidence? In the span of this entire investigation, they've turned up an e-mail chain, with someone loosely(and I'm being very generous) connected to the Kremlin.
You know who might go down in all this? Paul Manafort. Why? Tax fraud from a decade ago, unrelated to the campaign.
Woah, got the big fish on this one. I'm sure you'll be totally satisfied with that result.
You're bizarrely detached from the investigation, it seems.
I don't think it's a matter of whether the Oval Office is involved, but how deeply. I don't question that collusion happened, but how much and by whom.
We will see. If I'm wrong, I'll admit that. It won't be much because I'm not that attached to my speculative position.
I've said what I'll do if it turns out I'm wrong, like a man does.ROFL
Riiight...
I've said what I'll do if it turns out I'm wrong
Sorry Overpressure, but @Diamond Jim's twitter feed isn't evidence.
Seriously, what hard evidence(not WaPo sourced "claims") do they have?
And again, collusion isn't a crime, so I don't even know what you're wishing for, even in the best case fantasy scenario for your mental health.
I didn't like em but there's nothing to delegitimize them *known* yet despite what seems to me at least to be a clear attempt.Just like you accepted the election results, right?
I didn't like em but there's nothing to delegitimize them *known* yet despite what seems to me at least to be a clear attempt.
Will you admit that Russia certainly attempted to interfere with the voting machines?
I'm sure what looks to be a mutually solicitous relationship with the Russians also doesn't bother you.I'll admit that an attempted hack is irrelevant to the election results, and not worth discussing. If you had access to the DHS files, you'd find nearly every adversarial country under the sun have "attempted" similar hacks, on electronic voting machines, and continue to "attempt" hacks of all sorts into the government, every single day.