Social South African Destruction Now Almost Assured

[Shoemaker]

All of them white. Now the USA is becoming a majority non-white nation, and the new majority, made up of hispanics & blacks, who overwhelmingly vote for more socialism, will destroy the USA. See, when people like you read/hear this obvious truth, you don't get upset because you think it's bullshit... you get upset because you know deep down that it's true. Non-whites, along with their white 'progressive' allies, are fast on their way to destroying the USA and I get to sit back and say 'I told you so'. How hilarious. <45>

Are you an American?

 

[panamaican]

Mexican and Peruvian native cultures were obliterated, the nobles were baptized, converted and given nobility and the rest were worked to near death most of the time, couple with diseases and some good old book burning by the inquisition.

That being said, Spanish-American holdings were divided into three viceroyalties.

Viceroyalty of New Spain, New Granada and Peru.

So it would make sense if there were 3 Hispanic nations, but alas, infighting and more infighting. Everyone wanted to be king of their own turf and pay taxes to nobody.

Every single Hispanic country is the result of a lot (or won depending on the side) civil war or sedition war.

Brazil managed to stay whole in a time where i would presume every Portuguese upstart would vie for their own kingdom.

My guess is that Brazil knew how to govern itself more as a nation since at a point Brazil was the seat of the Portuguese crown.

Meanwhile Mexico was filled with Creoles (american born europeans), who were always ruled by a Spanish born individual, so when they rebelled after France invaded Spain and saw the Spanish rule as illegitimate, they just didnt know how to fucking govern as a single country.

Its weird because in the case of Mexico, it was european vs europeans fighting for power without a clear cause and it took an educated indian to beat everyone and actually found the Mexican republic.

The difference is that no one rose up in Brazil to challenge the Portuguese colonial power before the establishment of a local government. But that did happen in the Spanish colonies.

In Brazil, the infrastructure for completely local government was firmly established (when the Portuguese moved their ruling court to Brazil for a few years and governed the Portuguese Empire from S.A.) and then independence was sought. In the Spanish colonies, they fought for independence and then tried to create completely local governments. History has shown that the 2nd method usually means a more volatile transition.

 

[Sir Galahad]

Then learn from us. Your, and the rest of the Western world's, idiot 'liberals' are a large part of why SA turned to shit.

Liberals are a threat to civilization around the world. Look what's happening in France and Germany.

 

[Rod1]

The difference is that no one rose up in Brazil to challenge the Portuguese colonial power before the establishment of a local government. But that did happen in the Spanish colonies.

In Brazil, the infrastructure for completely local government was firmly established (when the Portuguese moved their ruling court to Brazil for a few years and governed the Portuguese Empire from S.A.) and then independence was sought. In the Spanish colonies, they fought for independence and then tried to create completely local governments. History has shown that the 2nd method usually means a more volatile transition.

Yeah, this does makes a lot of sense.

Kinda like Republican party right now, in Mexico we all worked together as opposition, rich landowners, poor peasants, religious folks, royalists (loyal to the Spanish crown who saw the French appointed ruler of Spain as an usurper), republicans, liberals and conservatives, they all worked to together to make Mexico an independent nation.

Whatever unity Mexico had during the independence movement was fictional, it was a unity born out of opposition, like the republican party with Obama, but once we were free we saw that our unity was just a facade and we turned into civil war for decades as everyone had a different vision for Mexico which republicans ultimately won.

 

[Rod1]

Liberals are a threat to civilization around the world. Look what's happening in France and Germany.

Without liberals you would still be ruled by absolute divinely appointed monarchs.

There needs to be a balance.

 

[panamaican]

it was a unity born out of opposition...

The most concise way to describe it.

 

[KBE6EKCTAH_CCP]

White people, also, mind your own business. If we want to help our own, we will.

Ha ha dude, you have certainly upped the rethoric on this.

Btw, this thread just got me thinking....

Imagine if a homogenous western country such as I don't know....the Czech republic, opened its border to white flight. With hundreds of thousands of western people immigrating there to create a "white" country.

Crazy 10 years ago, but maybe not inconceavable in 10 years with the way Western countries are pissing off their native population with forced immigration from 3rd world shitholes.

 

[mygoddotcom]

Thanks, man. My "African refugee" statement was mostly joking.
My lady's parents have spent years begging her not to have kids in this country, and she really wants to move to Europe, so maybe this'll work out for the be
Now to just find a European country that isn't being invadedst..

Good luck with that...

 

[kuromusha]

All of them white. Now the USA is becoming a majority non-white nation, and the new majority, made up of hispanics & blacks, who overwhelmingly vote for more socialism, will destroy the USA. See, when people like you read/hear this obvious truth, you don't get upset because you think it's bullshit... you get upset because you know deep down that it's true. Non-whites, along with their white 'progressive' allies, are fast on their way to destroying the USA and I get to sit back and say 'I told you so'. How hilarious. <45>

lol Blacks aren't even a huge majority here. Their birthrates (mainly teen) are actually declining. If two groups are going to be the majority, it's going to be Hispanics and Asians. lol @ this European who knows absolutely jack shit about America.

 

[kuromusha]

Are you an American?

He's a European who should focus on his region rather than make baseless conclusions about a country he knows nothing about.

 

[Shoemaker]

He's a European who should focus on his region rather than make baseless conclusions about a country he knows nothing about.

Oh. Well then.

 

[goldennirvana]

1.- See there are only 2 political parties in the US, so you kinda need to explain yourself, you are saying a third socialist party will arise or something?

Once again Rod, I never mentioned Republicans. I said this: "There's still a war going on between those who want more socialism and the destruction of America, and those who are against that". I was not referring to a Democrat vs Republican war.

2.- Based on what?

Based on non-whites overwhelmingly voting Democrat, and the Democrat party moving further & further to the left. The Democrat party will become a black nationalist, Latino nationalist, socialist party, with strong sympathies for Islam. Like I said: the next great war in politics will be between black nationalists & La Raza members in the Democrat party. Gonna be HILARIOUS.

3.- Who are they? and your argument is that IQ creates wealth but the Flynn effect says that IQ is a product of wealth more than the inverse.

I never mentioned the Flynn effect.

 

[goldennirvana]

That's pretty stupid. The word "racist" does have a meaning. It's in every dictionary printed and online. No one has to deconstruct your argument to determine if racist is applicable to you or not. The quality of the specific argument that you lay out has no bearing on if it's a racist argument or not.

The word 'racist' has a dictionary-definition, but it's rarely used that way today. People are called racist for simply giving their opinion, even if it has nothing to do with race e.g. pointing out how shit Islam is. The SJW left rejects the dictionary-definition of the word, anyway. They just make up new definitions for certain words, to suit their agenda.

Today, the word 'racist' is used almost always as a debate-killer. Surely you're able to see that?

 

[goldennirvana]

lol Blacks aren't even a huge majority here. Their birthrates (mainly teen) are actually declining.

I'm well aware of that. But blacks will still form a large minority, which is why I included them.

 

[Rod1]

Once again Rod, I never mentioned Republicans. I said this: "There's still a war going on between those who want more socialism and the destruction of America, and those who are against that". I was not referring to a Democrat vs Republican war.


Based on non-whites overwhelmingly voting Democrat, and the Democrat party moving further & further to the left. The Democrat party will become a black nationalist, Latino nationalist, socialist party, with strong sympathies for Islam. Like I said: the next great war in politics will be between black nationalists & La Raza members in the Democrat party. Gonna be HILARIOUS.

I never mentioned the Flynn effect.

1.- You first say you are not talking about Dems vs Reps. then in the second point you claim minorities are voting Dems and Dems are becoming communists and nationalists. Effing LOL.

2.- Of course you didnt mentioned Flynn effect, because it destroys your whole argument.

3.- Weird that latinos are going to vote communists, when there is only one country in latin America who is under their thumb. The largest latin american nations have center to center-right parties as current rulers.

4.- Also its kind of weird how minorities voted for Hillary over the actual socialist in Bernie in the Democratic primaries.

 

[goldennirvana]

1.- You first say you are not talking about Dems vs Reps. then in the second point you claim minorities are voting Dems and Dems are becoming communists and nationalists. Effing LOL.

But I never mentioned Republicans did I, you fucking idiot? And I also never said "nationalists", I said BLACK nationalists, nor did I mention the word 'communist'. I can't tell if you're intentionally deceitful or just plain stupid.

The war is between the people currently making up a larger % of the Democrat ranks (black nationalists, hispanics nationalists, socialists, Islamists etc etc), and those who are against it - those who are against it DOES NOT mean 'Republican'. Are you starting to grasp it yet, Rod?

2.- Of course you didnt mentioned Flynn effect, because it destroys your whole argument.

Fallacy. I didn't mention it precisely because it debunks nothing.

3.- Weird that latinos are going to vote communists, when there is only one country in latin America who is under their thumb. The largest latin american nations have center to center-right parties as current rulers.

Again, you're putting words into my mouth. I NEVER mentioned the word 'communist'. I still can't tell if you're intentionally deceitful or just that fucking dumb. lol

Anyway, your logic is faulty. Different countries have different politics. We can see quite clearly that hispanics in the USA overwhelmingly vote Democrat and vote for more socialist policies. Do you deny this? What happens in Latin American countries isn't relevant. Stay on topic.

If we're going to have a discussion, either learn to read or stop being deceitful by putting words in my mouth. Okay?

 

[Rod1]

But I never mentioned Republicans did I, you fucking idiot? And I also never said "nationalists", I said BLACK nationalists, nor did I mention the word 'communist'. I can't tell if you're intentionally deceitful or just plain stupid.

The war is between the people currently making up a larger % of the Democrat ranks (black nationalists, hispanics nationalists, socialists, Islamists etc etc), and those who are against it - those who are against it DOES NOT mean 'Republican'. Are you starting to grasp it yet, Rod?



Fallacy. I didn't mention it precisely because it debunks nothing.



Again, you're putting words into my mouth. I NEVER mentioned the word 'communist'. I still can't tell if you're intentionally deceitful or just that fucking dumb. lol

Anyway, your logic is faulty. Different countries have different politics. We can see quite clearly that hispanics in the USA overwhelmingly vote Democrat and vote for more socialist policies. Do you deny this? What happens in Latin American countries isn't relevant. Stay on topic.

If we're going to have a discussion, either learn to read or stop being deceitful by putting words in my mouth. Okay?

1.- You never mention anything, thats your modus operandi, that way you can have plausible deniability when you get confronted with how much BS you actually push.


2.- Flynn effect does proves that average IQ is not the cause of the wealth of a nation but a result.


3.- Again, they vote democrats because Republicans are a shitty party who only has identity politics to show, and these identity politics dont appeal to Hispanics.

And lol at Democrats being socialists, Democrats are less socialists than right wing parties in Europe.

 

[Handsomebwonderfull]

wait wait....

did that idiot say latinos vote democrat for socialist policies lol.

that's fucking retarded.
they vote democrat because democrats don't have their heads up their asses on immigration. instead of losing hundreds of billions on detention, deportation, loss of tax revenue, etc they say give a clear path to immigration for immigrants.

that's not socialism. socialism is like public schools, public roads, public police, public fire departments, public military, public mail, parks, free speech, free vote, all are mechanisms of power and regardless of your wealth you get to use them because they are public owned by society and shared.

politics 101. America is a Federal-social-republic-aristocracy-appointed obligarchy if you want to get cute. It's always been that way.

 

[goldennirvana]

1.- You never mention anything

I mentioned plenty of things but because you're either too stupid to read properly or just plain deceitful, you can only put words in my mouth.

thats your modus operandi, that way you can have plausible deniability when you get confronted with how much BS you actually push.

YOU claimed I was talking about Democrats vs Republicans, and I never even mentioned Republicans. I clearly said 'those who are for socialism and those who are against socialism', and YOU interpreted that as 'Democrats vs Republicans'. That's on YOU, not me.

I also never mentioned communists, but you claim I did. And yet somehow it's me who's pushing BS? LOL

2.- Flynn effect does proves that average IQ is not the cause of the wealth of a nation but a result.

I'm sure it's a mixture of both IQ influencing wealth, and wealth influencing IQ. I also think anyone who doesn't believe tens of thousands of years of evolution in vastly different parts of the world between the different races didn't have an effect on the brains of those races is a moron.

3.- Again, they vote democrats because Republicans are a shitty party who only has identity politics to show

ROFL!!!!!!!! It's the Democrats who are obsessed with identity politics now. Republicans don't go NEAR race/identity. What the fuck are you talking about? You really have no idea.

Both parties are shit, and that's the truth. But blacks & Hispanics overwhelmingly vote Democrat because so many of them love free stuff. And they consistently vote for more free stuff, which the Democrats always promise them. Democrats get something out of it (more votes, which is why they're in favour of open borders, so they can flood the USA with Democrat voters), and the migrants get something out of it (free stuff).

Democrats will destroy the USA.

and these identity politics dont appeal to Hispanics.

Republicans aren't so in favour of giving them free stuff.

Republicans aren't pushing identity politics. You really have no idea what you're talking about.

And lol at Democrats being socialists, Democrats are less socialists than right wing parties in Europe.

... says the guy who thinks Republicans are the party pushing identity politics today.

You are so dumb. LOL

I guarantee your IQ isn't over 85.

 

[goldennirvana]

wait wait....

did that idiot say latinos vote democrat for socialist policies lol.

that's fucking retarded.

Great argument. Flawless. Which such a strong counter-argument, and with all the evidence you provide to prove me wrong, any response to you is obviously futile.

they vote democrat because democrats don't have their heads up their asses on immigration.

Hispanics overwhelmingly vote Democrat for 'free stuff'.

Democrats are so in favour of no borders because it means they're importing Democrat voters into the country. Hispanics, and every other non-white group, overwhelmingly votes Democrat. If Russian Orthodox Christians were flooding into the USA by the millions and overwhelmingly voting Republican AND moving the Republican party further to the right, you'd suddenly see Democrats speaking out against illegal immigration. It's so funny because it's so true. They're so transparent. LOL

instead of losing hundreds of billions on detention, deportation, loss of tax revenue, etc they say give a clear path to immigration for immigrants.

To Democrats, a "clear path" = no borders.

that's not socialism. socialism is like public schools, public roads, public police, public fire departments, public military, public mail, parks, free speech, free vote, all are mechanisms of power and regardless of your wealth you get to use them because they are public owned by society and shared.

You have no idea what socialism is. Venezuela, Cuba, Soviet Union etc etc are socialism. How'd they turn out? Come back in 50-100 years time, and that's what the USA will be like.

You failed to debunk my argument that Hispanics overwhelmingly vote Democrat for more socialist policies, such as 'free stuff'. Whenever you're ready to, go ahead.