Till the SC finally has a proper deliberation on this and delivers an official full ruling this will continue as long as Trump attempts a travel ban for the entirety of his Presidency. They need to leave what they currently have alone, submit it for the SC and leave it the hell alone till the SC has a chance to actually rule on it in it's entirety.
He has three more years, baring an actual impeachment attempt, to get this going. He doesn't have to keep fidgeting with it right now. He has time to let it play out in the SC. Right now, this constant back and forth with the judge in Hawaii is a joke.
Although I will say I enjoy the precedent the Democrats are setting with this and look forward to seeing if more conservative judges will do the same to any future Democrat President in regards to immigration in the future because despite all the bullshit said in this forum this is very much an ongoing example of legislating from the bench to counteract an unfavorable decision by the President, which is well established as within the powers of his office to enact.
You don't have to like it, you can argue about any supposed reason behind it, but it's still within the powers of his office to do so and the faster the SC moves to either support or refute that the sooner this shit can be concluded and attention moved on to any of the other myriad actions Democrats have objections to regarding his Presidency.