Remarkable rebuttal. Here, I'll clue you in. In that clip, the sun is setting below the horizon. That's why it disappeared from the bottom up. It's common sense. It's what happens when things move behind other things. They disappear from view. You can observe this with your eyes in every day life.
You know what else you can observe in every day life? When things get further away from you, they appear smaller. So then why does the sun stay the same apparent size, regardless of whether it's right above you, or it's on the horizon. How many other objects do you know of that "grow dimmer as they move away from you, until they disappear" but stay the same apparent size?
That's literally the same thing that I posted, except there are trees on the horizon. I do like how you're now attempting to pivot towards "well the sunlight gets dimmer, not the actual sun..." as if that makes any sense whatsoever. Yeah, normal people are well aware of the fact that it gets darker when the sun sets. It's called night time. The reason for it is because the sun is the source of light on Earth, and when it drops below the horizon, that light no longer reaches that part of the Earth.
Now again, explain why the sun disappears below the horizon instead of simply "dimming as it moves further away, until you can't see it" which is apparently what you believe?
I don't know if you remember, but I'm actually the guy that you tried to push this bullshit on several weeks ago. And then I responded, and you disappeared (but maybe you just got dimmer and dimmer until I couldn't see your posts anymore).
here's the post you never bothered responding to.
So again, feel free to respond to that post, including the bit about the inverse square law (you know, that thing you have no understanding of, but keep alluding to, as if it's some point in your favor).