- Joined
- Sep 16, 2019
- Messages
- 2,619
- Reaction score
- 3,466
the “champ champ” criteria is kinda meaningless. strictly speaking, you can enter that conversation by winning only 2 fights, without regard to quality of the performances or the number of defenses, so what does it really prove? gsp is an all-time great fighter, but is his legacy really improved by the fact that dana gave him a fasttracked title shot against one of the weakest middleweight champions ever? in a way, that kind of hurts his legacy. and it’s great that cormier has defenses in both hw and lhw, but can you really say cormier is a better champ-champ than jones when jones beat cormier twice? that’s very counterintuitive and frankly silly.
so the question is basically “who is the best fighter” in that exclusive club, which inevitably focuses on the fighters’ accomplishments in their “main” weight class.
jones or gsp.
so the question is basically “who is the best fighter” in that exclusive club, which inevitably focuses on the fighters’ accomplishments in their “main” weight class.
jones or gsp.