- Joined
- Oct 31, 2016
- Messages
- 10,556
- Reaction score
- 3,920
Is this evidence reviews are bought and paid for? That game was a steaming pile of dogshit, there's no way in hell that game should've gotten anything past a 6.
They also gave Far Cry 4 an 8.5 when It was just basically Far Cry 3.2.
I'm pretty sure they been bought and payed for years judging by their crazy review numbers.
Weird how people always single out IGN while failing to acknowledge that they're usually in line with the aggregate scores from tens or hundreds of other review sites.
I don't know how they have been recently but years back it was plain as day. Of course gamespot is not innocent anymore, we all know about the Kane and Lynch incidentWeird how people always single out IGN while failing to acknowledge that they're usually in line with the aggregate scores from tens or hundreds of other review sites.
I thought 3 and it's expansion were pretty well liked?Dont know why people shit on the Far Cry games so much, never played Primal but Far Cry 4 was a great game as was Far Cry 3. They deserve their scores way more than most games.