- Joined
- Oct 30, 2004
- Messages
- 92,896
- Reaction score
- 28,850
I didn't argue that this voter panel alone proves CNN network-wide bias against Trump. My claim is that the choice of such a panel at this particular time is highly suggestive of anti-Trump bias on the part of Camerota and/or her program's producers.
I'd say barely even suggestive. If you went in thinking that there was a 50/50 chance that the host (whom I'm personally unfamiliar with) was biased against Trump, you're probably coming out thinking the same.
Furthermore, given my experience with extensive viewing of CNN's programs over the past two years, I can state confidently that it is highly unlikely that Camerota will balance this segment with a similarly weird demographic cutting the opposite direction (e.g., strong supporters of Clinton in 2016 who have since decided that Trump is a great president).
I should hope not. In a country as big as America, I'm sure that such people exist, but I can't imagine they'd be easy to find or that there would be any reason to make the effort.
Oh', but you did, in just about every post you made. Now you're running in here for support from your little crew.
You're changing the subject to levy a ridiculous allegation, no? True statements that make you mad /= lies. What I was commenting on was how remarkable it is that right-wingers have apparently embraced the rightly much-mocked opposition to "cultural appropriation" as well as racial quotas. Two things I would not have expected to see.