- Joined
- Dec 31, 2010
- Messages
- 35,538
- Reaction score
- 4,983
They ordered Mcdonald's because they don't have time to cook as they were too busy studying for their exams and go to college.
The issue is they were taking advantage of a severely mentally disabled man through intimidation. Of course he'll get his money back, but he shouldn't have been forced in that position in the first place.
Either way, those kids are fucked now. 16 million views. God damn.
Intimidating How?Intimidating...HOW? They were having a conversation with him while laughing and giggling. The guy was free to walk at any moment but instead he chose to give them some money back on his own accord. And severely disabled??? Get the hell out of here with the over the top drama. While the guy certainly isn't 100% he is functioning well enough to hold a job, have a drivers license, speak with a normal tone and hold a reasonable dialogue, etc..
Looks like it is.Isn't that exactly what the situation is here?
by 'robbed', you mean 'took advantage' right? As they did not force him to hand over money even if what they did was pretty shitty.in my opinion, based on how this works and this guy is just a delivery person, where he is not paid for the product just to deliver, they robbed him
Abso-fucking-lutely robbery. Bunch of bullies. Could use a few soccer kicks if you know what I mean.in my opinion, based on how this works and this guy is just a delivery person, where he is not paid for the product just to deliver, they robbed him
Nah, it's obvious the guy is upset and not sure what to do. They know they could get their money back through the app. Just because they didn't threaten him with violence doesn't mean it wasn't robbery. That's like saying I didn't rob someone of their phone, I simply took advantage of their kindness to let me borrow it when I lied about being lost.by 'robbed', you mean 'took advantage' right? As they did not force him to hand over money even if what they did was pretty shitty.
There is no instance where you say 'we paid for it, give us the money back' and the person does so under no suggested threat or forced coercion that it would be cited as robbery. The guy could have simply said 'no' to it.Nah, it's obvious the guy is upset and not sure what to do. They know they could get their money back through the app. Just because they didn't threaten him with violence doesn't mean it wasn't robbery. That's like saying I didn't rob someone of their phone, I simply took advantage of their kindness to let me borrow it when I lied about being lost.
Is there a law for taking advantage of people who are vulnerable?There is no instance where you say 'we paid for it, give us the money back' and the person does so under no suggested threat or forced coercion that it would be cited as robbery. The guy could have simply said 'no' to it.
Again not saying they were not wrong in taking advantage of him but it is NOT robbery.
Intimidating...HOW? They were having a conversation with him while laughing and giggling. The guy was free to walk at any moment but instead he chose to give them some money back on his own accord. And severely disabled??? Get the hell out of here with the over the top drama. While the guy certainly isn't 100% he is functioning well enough to hold a job, have a drivers license, speak with a normal tone and hold a reasonable dialogue, etc..
There is no instance where you say 'we paid for it, give us the money back' and the person does so under no suggested threat or forced coercion that it would be cited as robbery. The guy could have simply said 'no' to it.
Again not saying they were not wrong in taking advantage of him but it is NOT robbery.
Much ado about nothing here. They were laughing and giggling and not pinning him against a wall or holding him against his will. He could have easily just walked away and told them to take it up with DoorDash. They didn't surround him or push him (at least not on camera) so it's not a big deal.
Anybody mentioning violence / retaliation is pretty absurd to be honest. DoorDash will likely compensate the driver and everybody will be made whole...nothing to get excited about here folks.
Much ado about nothing here. They were laughing and giggling and not pinning him against a wall or holding him against his will. He could have easily just walked away and told them to take it up with DoorDash. They didn't surround him or push him (at least not on camera) so it's not a big deal.
Anybody mentioning violence / retaliation is pretty absurd to be honest. DoorDash will likely compensate the driver and everybody will be made whole...nothing to get excited about here folks.
I wonder how this poor bastard feels about everyone on the internet thinking he’s retarded if he isn’t?Intimidating...HOW? They were having a conversation with him while laughing and giggling. The guy was free to walk at any moment but instead he chose to give them some money back on his own accord. And severely disabled??? Get the hell out of here with the over the top drama. While the guy certainly isn't 100% he is functioning well enough to hold a job, have a drivers license, speak with a normal tone and hold a reasonable dialogue, etc..
I'm actually more offended by the fact that they think nothing of recording and posting this online.
they all look old enough for the death penalty imoNot to surprising because they are clearly kids. One of them looks like he's 12.