- Joined
- May 8, 2011
- Messages
- 45,469
- Reaction score
- 20,973
literally none of the guys he beat won more than one belt without losing the first. they are not more than decent in comparison to literally every other era of featherweights in the history of the sport. please keep arguing with me and making it more obvious you don’t watch boxing.elanimalsantana said: ↑
elanimalsantana said: ↑
Yeah, defeating (at least) five World Champions is just one or two "decent guys" while Conor got spanked by a gatekeeper on 11 days notice
View attachment 486563
I know more about boxing than you I guarantee it. It is obvious that all Champions aren't equal, even a shertard like you can understand that. But to deny that Hamed defeated more top notch fighters than Conor and say he
Did I say that every person that wins a belt is an all time great did? Your ignorance abounds. I don't need to Google shit you moron I know who those guys are. I've seen more boxing than you I guarantee it, been watching (and attending) since before your nit-witted ass was born. But the guys that I mentioned that Hamed defeated didn't just win belts some won more than one and defended them as well which makes them more than "decent".
Now STFU and go back to mommie's basement and fap to Conor where you can enjoy your stupidity without sharing with the world just what an idiot you are.
naseem was ranked on the rings end-of-the-year featherweight lists often without fighting literally anyone else in the top ten. i’m sure you knew that though.