- Joined
- Oct 30, 2004
- Messages
- 92,600
- Reaction score
- 28,365
Strawman. I never claimed you claimed to have evidence that Trump told Flynn to lie. I'm quite sure you don't have such evidence and that's why it's hilarious that you're so confident in that proposition.
I said there's a roughly 75% chance of it. And I explained why. There's nothing resembling a strawman there.
Strawman of the century. When did I ever write such a thing?
You've continually insisted, with no basis whatsoever, that Trump is innocent in this. You're denying it now? Or do you just not like the word "pure"? That's not a strawman. The substance is the same.
If you ask me again without purporting to know the answer, I might tell you.
Well, now you're saying that accurately representing your view as expressed in past posting is a "strawman." So that implies that you don't think that Trump is innocent. So why would I ask why you think he's innocent? I guess I can ask why you changed your view.
Strawman #3. You're really outdoing yourself today. Something go wrong in your personal life again?
LOL! So you think that FISA would issue warrants appropriately? So then why act like there's something improper?
Sure, we can tighten up the language as we move toward the official bet.
For example, to spy on the Trump campaign without the mandated approval from superiors would qualify as "meddling" by my definition.
OK.