Theft is so bad in San Francisco that Groceries are now Locked Up

Your logic here doesn't follow. Yes, SF has had more problems recently, no, the city government has not changed. When was SF conservative? Back in the 1800s? That is a failed correlation.

No, state laws and the criminal code are made primarily by the legislature and not the city. There are city policies that affect crime obviously, but not as much in terms of the actual laws around serious crimes and length of incarceration; Governers also have a lot of power to limit mayors they don't agree with (e.g. Florida). You also assume that this correlation is causal, which we don't know that it is. Could it be that large population centers are just having a lot of problems these days for complicated reasons? No, because that would ruin the narrative of blaming your problems on those you disagree with; better to oversimplify something you can't understand in a way those is positive for you.

But let's take your theme and run with it. Let's go to the state level, especially since some states have far less 'big city' population than others. Which states are the most dangerous per capita at the state level? Let's take a look.

What are the Most Dangerous States?​

StateTotal Score
Louisiana31.64
Mississippi32.52
Arkansas33.72
Texas36.77
Alabama37.68
Oklahoma39.34
Florida39.52
Missouri40.25
South Carolina41.03
Tennessee41.34

Now let's use a different measure that only includes crime rate:

1.New Mexico6,462
2.Louisiana6,408
3.Colorado6,091
4.South Carolina5,973
5.Arkansas5,899
6.Oklahoma5,870
7.Washington5,759
8.Tennessee5,658
9.Oregon5,610
10.Missouri5,605
11.Alaska5,359
12.Utah5,190
13.Hawaii5,077
14.Arizona4,940
15.Texas4,937
16.North Carolina4,872
17.Kansas4,823
18.Alabama4,727
19.
Yeah, but look at the original site... Wallethub? Categories:
Total ScorePersonal & Residential SafetyFinancial SafetyRoad SafetyWorkplace SafetyEmergency Preparedness
Meh...
 
I'm going to throw in a bonus for those blaming problems on Democratic mayor in big cities. Let's look at who has the most crime in smaller towns where you can't depend on blaming it on a Democrat mayor. (Hint before you click: They are mostly in conservative states):

 
Yeah, but look at the original site... Wallethub? Categories:
Total ScorePersonal & Residential SafetyFinancial SafetyRoad SafetyWorkplace SafetyEmergency Preparedness
Meh...
Did you read the whole post? The second list is only crime rate.
 
The heavy jail sentencing doesn't work, that was a failed policy. Just about every state and community has been rolling these laws back.
Prison doesn't seem to work very well at deterring crime, and people tend to come out worse than they went in, and obviously with less employability etc. It's also expensive. However it undeniably prevents inmates from committing crimes against the public (although not against other inmates) while they're there, and satisfies a desire for vengeance. Most criminals just do crime after crime until they die or get too old - the longer they are banged up, the fewer crimes they're able to commit.
 
Unless the mental institutions are privately owned. But who cares? Socialism of services like fire/police or the like, people accept.

But when you start demanding the same as me? no. I want to live in a system that allows me to be better than you.

As for the heavily jailed policy failing? It's not worse than what we are seeing right now.

What we have right now is a regressive dystopian society where we have to have FOOD under lock and key.

San Francisco is in no way dystopian, that's just hyperbole. I agree that the current state is not good but there is also changing behavior patterns. Less people going to some parts of the city with more telecommuting and such.
 
It is too much typing to explain the meaning and how it relates to what you said, you'll have to interpret that yourself; I don't see that it is a hard concept. However, let's look deeper into this idea that we can blame Democratice big city mayors for crime. Let's get a few sources and a narrative to look at that in examining rural areas and small towns (sources first):




The narrative that violent crime is an issue exclusively pertaining to large cities is misleading. Reports indicate that rural America has also seen a significant increase in violent crime rates, including a notable 25% spike in homicide rates, which is not far behind the 30% increase observed in urban areas. This challenges the perception of rural areas as idyllic, crime-free zones and underscores the national nature of recent increases in violent crime, influenced more by the pandemic's widespread impact than by geographic or political factors.

Moreover, despite an increase in the national average levels of violent crime in rural areas, the unique needs of law enforcement in these communities often go underdiscussed. Rural law enforcement agencies, which tend to operate with minimal resources, face challenges in accessing the equipment and training necessary for effective crime reduction and public safety. However, these agencies often benefit from strong interpersonal ties within their communities, which can foster trust and collaboration between the police and the public. This relationship is crucial for implementing evidence-based policing practices tailored to the specific needs, crime trends, and resources of small, rural, and tribal agencies.

In summary, while crime rates are generally higher in urban areas, rural areas have also experienced increases in violent crimes, challenging stereotypes about rural safety. Both urban and rural areas face unique challenges in addressing crime, underscoring the importance of tailored approaches to law enforcement and community engagement across different types of communities.
 
Your logic here doesn't follow. Yes, SF has had more problems recently, no, the city government has not changed. When was SF conservative? Back in the 1800s? That is a failed correlation.

No, state laws and the criminal code are made primarily by the legislature and not the city. There are city policies that affect crime obviously, but not as much in terms of the actual laws around serious crimes and length of incarceration; Governers also have a lot of power to limit mayors they don't agree with (e.g. Florida). You also assume that this correlation is causal, which we don't know that it is. Could it be that large population centers are just having a lot of problems these days for complicated reasons? No, because that would ruin the narrative of blaming your problems on those you disagree with; better to oversimplify something you can't understand in a way those is positive for you.

But let's take your theme and run with it. Let's go to the state level, especially since some states have far less 'big city' population than others. Which states are the most dangerous per capita at the state level? Let's take a look.

What are the Most Dangerous States?​

StateTotal Score
Louisiana31.64
Mississippi32.52
Arkansas33.72
Texas36.77
Alabama37.68
Oklahoma39.34
Florida39.52
Missouri40.25
South Carolina41.03
Tennessee41.34

Now let's use a different measure that only includes crime rate:

1.New Mexico6,462
2.Louisiana6,408
3.Colorado6,091
4.South Carolina5,973
5.Arkansas5,899
6.Oklahoma5,870
7.Washington5,759
8.Tennessee5,658
9.Oregon5,610
10.Missouri5,605
11.Alaska5,359
12.Utah5,190
13.Hawaii5,077
14.Arizona4,940
15.Texas4,937
16.North Carolina4,872
17.Kansas4,823
18.Alabama4,727
19.California4,720
20.Montana4,711
21.North Dakota4,577
22.Minnesota4,527
23.Mississippi4,494
24.South Dakota4,415
25.Georgia4,415
26.Delaware4,355
27.Nevada4,314
28.Nebraska4,152
29.Ohio4,009
30.Indiana3,924
31.Florida3,922
32.Kentucky3,818
33.Iowa3,700
34.Pennsylvania3,678
35.Maryland3,619
36.Illinois3,545
37.Wyoming3,455
38.Connecticut3,312
39.Wisconsin3,295
40.Michigan3,200
41.New York3,185
42.West Virginia3,155
43.Virginia3,121
44.Rhode Island2,722
45.Vermont2,607
46.New Jersey2,512
47.Idaho2,466
48.Maine2,421
49.Massachusetts2,415
50.New Hampshire2,344
San Francisco was last controlled by Republicans in 1964. San Francisco has noticeably gone from one of the best cities in the US to one of the worst recently. Despite it being one of the wealthiest areas with tons of jobs and an amazing climate.

People have been leaving San Francisco since 2019: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CASANF0POP
And the people leaving aren't the homeless, drug addicts or criminals. It's likely people with high paying tech jobs. There's going to be an exodus of high earners leading to falling tax revenues:
Leading to shortfalls in their fiscal projections: https://www.sf.gov/sites/default/files/2023-03/March Update FY 23-24 through FY 27-28.pdf
The shortfall for the coming fiscal year (FY 2023-24) is forecast to grow to $290.9 million, or$90.1 million higher than our last projection.

This is crazy, people don't generally leave big cities at that rate, especially ones that have a lot of job opportunities.

Democrats have shifted further left socially in the past 20 years. Not sure why you assume all Democrats are the same. 20 years ago, most democrats thought gay marriage should stay illegal. They have gotten a lot more lax on crime. Prop 47 was when the general theft problem started that was voted on by California voters as a whole (most of which reside in the coastal cities which are heavily democrat). The homeless problem and drug problems have been consistently growing over time and the solutions have only made it worse over time.

The "most dangerous states" includes things like financial safety, road safety, emergency preparedness, climate disasters, etc. Not really a fair metric in terms of comparison.

I agree that many red states have deep blue cities who have voted Democrat for decades/centuries which cause their crime numbers to shoot up. Perhaps if instead of being less tough on crime which they have been shifting towards the past few decades, they instead prioritize locking up violent criminals they could potentially have less crime. But they continue to elect people who allow crime to run rampant and many electing DAs who refuse to prosecute criminals. It's unfortunate but it's a reality of the demographics that continue to loyally vote Democrat no matter what.
 
San Francisco is in no way dystopian, that's just hyperbole. I agree that the current state is not good but there is also changing behavior patterns. Less people going to some parts of the city with more telecommuting and such.
The first step in dealing with a problem is admitting you have one.

The state of San Fran now compared to how it was when I lived there is night and day. It's trended in the wrong direction for the past 20 years and it's directly due to failed democratic policies based on bullshit and virtue.

So that some ignorant asshat can stand at a podium and feel good saying hollow words.
 
voted for in the city, the state, the country or the planet?

because its everywhere.

How did elected officials dictate items locked up in stores?

You marched in the streets and donated billions to BLM, George Floyd and you wanted to defund the police, you voted for Biden and Kamala Harris … sending a clear message that crime is ok … this is what you voted for.
 
Your logic here doesn't follow. Yes, SF has had more problems recently, no, the city government has not changed. When was SF conservative? Back in the 1800s? That is a failed correlation.

No, state laws and the criminal code are made primarily by the legislature and not the city. There are city policies that affect crime obviously, but not as much in terms of the actual laws around serious crimes and length of incarceration; Governers also have a lot of power to limit mayors they don't agree with (e.g. Florida). You also assume that this correlation is causal, which we don't know that it is. Could it be that large population centers are just having a lot of problems these days for complicated reasons? No, because that would ruin the narrative of blaming your problems on those you disagree with; better to oversimplify something you can't understand in a way those is positive for you.

But let's take your theme and run with it. Let's go to the state level, especially since some states have far less 'big city' population than others. Which states are the most dangerous per capita at the state level? Let's take a look.

What are the Most Dangerous States?​


lol... That site is complete garbage. Utah is the 13th most dangerous state?.... Fuck Off. Try using real crime stats instead of made up bullshit. Utah has one of the lowest crime rates in the US.

And wow at New Mexico... And what the fuck happened to Colorado since I moved in 2005? Not surprised California has the worst robbery in the nation outside of DC.

Data in this table is from the FBI and for the year 2022

LocationViolent
crime
HomicideRapeRobberyAg.
Assault
United States380.76.340.066.1268.2
District of Columbia812.329.341.5357.5383.9
New Mexico780.512.054.6110.6603.3
Alaska758.99.5134.075.1540.2
Arkansas645.310.276.039.7519.4
Louisiana628.616.143.067.3502.1
Tennessee621.68.638.267.1507.6
California499.55.737.4123.5332.8
Colorado492.56.463.472.6350.1
South Carolina491.311.238.240.6401.3
Missouri488.010.148.954.8374.2
Michigan461.06.964.836.6352.7
Nevada454.06.858.986.1302.3
Texas431.96.750.070.5304.7
Arizona431.56.844.170.1310.5
New York429.34.029.5112.0283.8
Oklahoma419.76.757.540.6314.8
Montana417.94.554.423.3335.7
Kansas414.64.645.529.2335.4
Alabama409.110.929.634.5334.1
North Carolina405.18.130.554.9311.6
Maryland398.58.530.6114.2245.2
Delaware383.54.822.057.0299.8
South Dakota377.44.355.825.3292.0
Washington375.65.039.286.8244.7
Georgia367.08.236.443.6278.8
Oregon342.44.540.668.6228.7
Massachusetts322.02.129.137.7253.1
Indiana306.26.232.843.0224.2
Wisconsin297.05.338.639.4213.7
Ohio293.66.148.453.1185.9
Illinois287.37.848.184.7146.7
Iowa286.51.742.521.6220.7
Nebraska282.83.255.329.1195.2
Minnesota280.63.240.757.0179.7
Pennsylvania279.97.929.568.1174.5
North Dakota279.63.556.727.6191.8
West Virginia277.94.644.410.0218.9
Hawaii259.62.137.966.1153.5
Florida258.95.030.233.6190.1
Mississippi245.07.833.725.6178.0
Utah241.82.059.529.6150.7
Idaho241.42.748.78.2181.7
Virginia234.07.330.238.4158.1
Vermont221.93.436.813.3168.5
Kentucky214.16.833.838.1135.4
New Jersey202.93.116.847.6135.4
Wyoming201.92.662.87.9128.7
Rhode Island172.31.538.024.6108.3
Connecticut150.03.818.144.983.3
New Hampshire125.61.839.616.168.1
Maine103.32.232.010.059.0
 
lol... That site is complete garbage. Utah is the 13th most dangerous state?.... Fuck Off. Try using real crime stats instead of made up bullshit. Utah has one of the lowest crime rates in the US.

And wow at New Mexico... And what the fuck happened to Colorado since I moved in 2005? Not surprised California has the worst robbery in the nation outside of DC.

Data in this table is from the FBI and for the year 2022

LocationViolent
crime
HomicideRapeRobberyAg.
Assault
United States380.76.340.066.1268.2
District of Columbia812.329.341.5357.5383.9
New Mexico780.512.054.6110.6603.3
Alaska758.99.5134.075.1540.2
Arkansas645.310.276.039.7519.4
Louisiana628.616.143.067.3502.1
Tennessee621.68.638.267.1507.6
California499.55.737.4123.5332.8
Colorado492.56.463.472.6350.1
South Carolina491.311.238.240.6401.3
Missouri488.010.148.954.8374.2
Michigan461.06.964.836.6352.7
Nevada454.06.858.986.1302.3
Texas431.96.750.070.5304.7
Arizona431.56.844.170.1310.5
New York429.34.029.5112.0283.8
Oklahoma419.76.757.540.6314.8
Montana417.94.554.423.3335.7
Kansas414.64.645.529.2335.4
Alabama409.110.929.634.5334.1
North Carolina405.18.130.554.9311.6
Maryland398.58.530.6114.2245.2
Delaware383.54.822.057.0299.8
South Dakota377.44.355.825.3292.0
Washington375.65.039.286.8244.7
Georgia367.08.236.443.6278.8
Oregon342.44.540.668.6228.7
Massachusetts322.02.129.137.7253.1
Indiana306.26.232.843.0224.2
Wisconsin297.05.338.639.4213.7
Ohio293.66.148.453.1185.9
Illinois287.37.848.184.7146.7
Iowa286.51.742.521.6220.7
Nebraska282.83.255.329.1195.2
Minnesota280.63.240.757.0179.7
Pennsylvania279.97.929.568.1174.5
North Dakota279.63.556.727.6191.8
West Virginia277.94.644.410.0218.9
Hawaii259.62.137.966.1153.5
Florida258.95.030.233.6190.1
Mississippi245.07.833.725.6178.0
Utah241.82.059.529.6150.7
Idaho241.42.748.78.2181.7
Virginia234.07.330.238.4158.1
Vermont221.93.436.813.3168.5
Kentucky214.16.833.838.1135.4
New Jersey202.93.116.847.6135.4
Wyoming201.92.662.87.9128.7
Rhode Island172.31.538.024.6108.3
Connecticut150.03.818.144.983.3
New Hampshire125.61.839.616.168.1
Maine103.32.232.010.059.0
You forgot the most important data point. CA doesn't even capture 99% of robberies and theft due to the $950 limit not being a crime and car break ins not even called in because Cops won't investigate.
 
It is too much typing to explain the meaning and how it relates to what you said, you'll have to interpret that yourself; I don't see that it is a hard concept. However, let's look deeper into this idea that we can blame Democratice big city mayors for crime. Let's get a few sources and a narrative to look at that in examining rural areas and small towns (sources first):




The narrative that violent crime is an issue exclusively pertaining to large cities is misleading. Reports indicate that rural America has also seen a significant increase in violent crime rates, including a notable 25% spike in homicide rates, which is not far behind the 30% increase observed in urban areas. This challenges the perception of rural areas as idyllic, crime-free zones and underscores the national nature of recent increases in violent crime, influenced more by the pandemic's widespread impact than by geographic or political factors.

Moreover, despite an increase in the national average levels of violent crime in rural areas, the unique needs of law enforcement in these communities often go underdiscussed. Rural law enforcement agencies, which tend to operate with minimal resources, face challenges in accessing the equipment and training necessary for effective crime reduction and public safety. However, these agencies often benefit from strong interpersonal ties within their communities, which can foster trust and collaboration between the police and the public. This relationship is crucial for implementing evidence-based policing practices tailored to the specific needs, crime trends, and resources of small, rural, and tribal agencies.

In summary, while crime rates are generally higher in urban areas, rural areas have also experienced increases in violent crimes, challenging stereotypes about rural safety. Both urban and rural areas face unique challenges in addressing crime, underscoring the importance of tailored approaches to law enforcement and community engagement across different types of communities.
I don't care who you want to blame. When police make arrests and criminals are let go, that creates a precedent. Since the BLM riots, and Covid the climate towards prosecution have changed. We have liberal DAs doing the damage more so than the mayors. We never had organized theft and looting like we do now and this is a result of the changes in laws and DAs. Cali is a perfect example as is NYC. Fill a bag and just walk out. No time for the crime. Illegal to detain suspects. Until laws toughen, it will continue. I guarantee if you make a solid law against organized shoplifting events, you will see less of them.
 
San Francisco was last controlled by Republicans in 1964. San Francisco has noticeably gone from one of the best cities in the US to one of the worst recently. Despite it being one of the wealthiest areas with tons of jobs and an amazing climate.

People have been leaving San Francisco since 2019: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CASANF0POP
And the people leaving aren't the homeless, drug addicts or criminals. It's likely people with high paying tech jobs. There's going to be an exodus of high earners leading to falling tax revenues:
Leading to shortfalls in their fiscal projections: https://www.sf.gov/sites/default/files/2023-03/March Update FY 23-24 through FY 27-28.pdf


This is crazy, people don't generally leave big cities at that rate, especially ones that have a lot of job opportunities.

Democrats have shifted further left socially in the past 20 years. Not sure why you assume all Democrats are the same. 20 years ago, most democrats thought gay marriage should stay illegal. They have gotten a lot more lax on crime. Prop 47 was when the general theft problem started that was voted on by California voters as a whole (most of which reside in the coastal cities which are heavily democrat). The homeless problem and drug problems have been consistently growing over time and the solutions have only made it worse over time.

The "most dangerous states" includes things like financial safety, road safety, emergency preparedness, climate disasters, etc. Not really a fair metric in terms of comparison.

I agree that many red states have deep blue cities who have voted Democrat for decades/centuries which cause their crime numbers to shoot up. Perhaps if instead of being less tough on crime which they have been shifting towards the past few decades, they instead prioritize locking up violent criminals they could potentially have less crime. But they continue to elect people who allow crime to run rampant and many electing DAs who refuse to prosecute criminals. It's unfortunate but it's a reality of the demographics that continue to loyally vote Democrat no matter what.
OK, let's take a look here:
1) How does the government of SF 60 years ago have anything to do with things now? It was a liberal government way before recent troubles, like almost 60 years, right? So, it didn't change hands from conservatives resulting in a downturn; that is absurd.

2) I see you are one of the many who doesn't understand the tech bit. Those people could never have been in the place they were without making it in CA if you are talking the Silicon Valley people and such who left; the build things up and them go other places where things are with cheaper expenses. And no, those are NOT the people hunting for a job.

3) As far as others leaving, that is only an acceleration of what has happened everywhere in the US over the last 30 years; at one time, the presidents had to convince people in every state to vote for them, not just the swing states because we are so much more geographically divided now (CA chose daddy Bush in 88 election, Texas was electing Democrats at times). Now since there has been a huge acceleration in our division recently, it isn't surprising that a heavily populated place a lot of Trumpers would leave a place like CA. I will also remind you of something about the high cost of living here- that is market driven. It costs more to live here because this is where people WANT to live and have the most opportunities. No one wants to live out in the dirt in Texas where things are cheap. That hasn't changed even with the flood of Trumpers going to find someone that agrees with their looney ideas. It is still crowded here where people actually live in the year 2024.

4) I'm not even going to comment on the absurdity of saying the left has gone radical in the age of MAGA; incredible hypocrisy. Also, like many on the right, your usage demonstrates you know nothing about what socialism actually is.

5) You are hiding from all of the posts which I've made since your first comment, including the one I responded to you with (not addressing my facts in any way). Here are the facts (see my posts in between for proof and citations): (1) Small towns and rural areas (not controlled by Dems), especially in conservative states, have had big jumps in crime along with big cities. (2) conservative states (including the whole state) have as much or more crime. (3) with an overall increase in crime in other areas Democrats don't control, there isn't much room to blame Democrats; it's a larger trend.

Again, I get that no matter the number of facts, it feels too good to abandon blaming those you don't like, but you really don't make a lot of sense.
 
Did you read the whole post? The second list is only crime rate.
From Wallet hub? I have to go back and see what it looks like but wallethub is a financial group.
 
You marched in the streets and donated billions to BLM, George Floyd and you wanted to defund the police, you voted for Biden and Kamala Harris … sending a clear message that crime is ok … this is what you voted for.
i dont live in the US my highly erudite, intelligent friend. I also possess something called a passport and see it in many countries at this point

But yeah its biden, Kamalla, black people, george floyds fault

Hell if we blaming individuals-

the actual tax evading, raping felon with 91 federal charges 20 sexual assault charges against them while rocking orange makeup
lent a hand too.

Crime pays
 
I'm going to throw in a bonus for those blaming problems on Democratic mayor in big cities. Let's look at who has the most crime in smaller towns where you can't depend on blaming it on a Democrat mayor. (Hint before you click: They are mostly in conservative states):

I randomly googled a few from this list, so far all black men as the mayor.
 
OK, let's take a look here:
1) How does the government of SF 60 years ago have anything to do with things now? It was a liberal government way before recent troubles, like almost 60 years, right? So, it didn't change hands from conservatives resulting in a downturn; that is absurd.

2) I see you are one of the many who doesn't understand the tech bit. Those people could never have been in the place they were without making it in CA if you are talking the Silicon Valley people and such who left; the build things up and them go other places where things are with cheaper expenses. And no, those are NOT the people hunting for a job.

3) As far as others leaving, that is only an acceleration of what has happened everywhere in the US over the last 30 years; at one time, the presidents had to convince people in every state to vote for them, not just the swing states because we are so much more geographically divided now (CA chose daddy Bush in 88 election, Texas was electing Democrats at times). Now since there has been a huge acceleration in our division recently, it isn't surprising that a heavily populated place a lot of Trumpers would leave a place like CA. I will also remind you of something about the high cost of living here- that is market driven. It costs more to live here because this is where people WANT to live and have the most opportunities. No one wants to live out in the dirt in Texas where things are cheap. That hasn't changed even with the flood of Trumpers going to find someone that agrees with their looney ideas. It is still crowded here where people actually live in the year 2024.

4) I'm not even going to comment on the absurdity of saying the left has gone radical in the age of MAGA; incredible hypocrisy. Also, like many on the right, your usage demonstrates you know nothing about what socialism actually is.

5) You are hiding from all of the posts which I've made since your first comment, including the one I responded to you with (not addressing my facts in any way). Here are the facts (see my posts in between for proof and citations): (1) Small towns and rural areas (not controlled by Dems), especially in conservative states, have had big jumps in crime along with big cities. (2) conservative states (including the whole state) have as much or more crime. (3) with an overall increase in crime in other areas Democrats don't control, there isn't much room to blame Democrats; it's a larger trend.

Again, I get that no matter the number of facts, it feels too good to abandon blaming those you don't like, but you really don't make a lot of sense.
1) Did you ignore Prop 47? California has continued regressing from where it was due to leftists voting in stupid leftist policies like Prop 47. And democrats of the past were less socially left than they are today. Again explain why the same democrat party went from not supporting gay marriage 20 years ago to where they are today.

2) That has been the case for the past few decades. Why are people suddenly leaving now at a such rapid pace?

3) Why don't you take a look at net migration between states and see where people are moving to and from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_and_territories_by_net_migration
Most are moving to red states from blue states, with New York, California, Illinois and Hawaii (all democrat strongholds) being on the bottom in terms of net domestic migration rates. This is despite the fact that places like California and Hawaii are geographically
some of the most desirable places to live in America.

4) Releasing people who have 50+ criminal convictions on the streets to murder, rape and brutally assault people is completely radical. It isn't done in other countries. It wasn't done for a long time in our country either.

5) I'm not avoiding anything.
2020:
Violent crime in Urban residences: 21.1
Violent crime in Suburban residences: 22.3
Violent crime in Rural residences: 16.3

2022:
Violent crime in Urban residences: 33.4
Violent crime in Suburban residences: 23.9
Violent crime in Rural residences: 15.4

One of these number increases are not like the others. I'll let you decipher which one that is.

And I don't understand why you are going to a state level. States don't dictate the mayors, the DAs/prosecutors or judges. These are all determined at a city/district level and these positions are the ones responsible for not locking repeating criminals up. So comparing at a city level is a much better comparison than states. But for some reason I don't think you want to do that.
 
i dont live in the US my highly erudite, intelligent friend. I also possess something called a passport and see it in many countries at this point

But yeah its biden, Kamalla, black people, george floyds fault

Hell if we blaming individuals-

the actual tax evading, raping felon with 91 federal charges 20 sexual assault charges against them while rocking orange makeup
lent a hand too.

Crime pays

You are only angry because you know it’s true. Americans bent the knee and capitulated to the criminals. They made their bed, now they get to lie in it.

I hope Biden wins again, they still haven’t learned their lesson.
 
Back
Top