- Joined
- Apr 11, 2015
- Messages
- 18,952
- Reaction score
- 13,335
Tiny, tiny pimp-hands.
He can backhand bitches without ruin the merchandise, only psychological damage
Tiny, tiny pimp-hands.
I don't see any history of this thread being merged with another.
it's not "because I've been told my only other choice is someone I 100% disagree with" it is "you have two choices, choose one. if you choose anything but these two you are throwing your vote away"Listen, we've firmly established you would abandon 99% of what you believe in while voting. I already know that, the actual math being broken down isn't necessary.
I, won't. I'm not going to support someone I 99% disagree with simply because I've been told my only other choice is someone I 100% disagree with. All that leads to is people picking between the lesser of two evils. That was never the intent of our democracy at all.
hillary and trump represented very different ideologies. if you're claiming neither one was more agreeable to you than the other you are straight up lying.And when neither of them will edge it in the direction you want, then what do you do? You're suggesting everyone's feelings are represented by one of the two candidates so they should make a choice. But what happens when neither represent any of your feelings? What do you do if both would edge it in a direction you don't want your country to go in, what would you do?
i never said that. i said that i know that in elections with only 2 candidates that have a chance of winning you need to choose one of those two or you're throwing your vote away. you can choose the one you like the most or you can choose the one you hate the least. it doesn't matter, there were only 2 candidates in that raceDo you really wanna talk about being "pretty edgy and anti-conformist" after your "I never said I had principles" display of teenage idiocy?
you can still have principles and vote between the only 2 candidates that had a chance.Yes, I am. I'm accomplishing the task of not abandoning what I believe in for an empty victory.
the accomplishment is voting for someon that you either wantged in the white house or preventing from someon you didn't want in the white house from getting in. you did neither. your vote was worthless.Yeah, if only i jumped on team Trump. I could be celebrating a promise right now buying coins with Kim on it. Such acomplish, so ment.
no, it's literally the people that wanted to keep trump out of the white house but couldn't be bothered to actually vote for the one person who could have prevented it.No that would be the idiots like you so devoid of principle and reason that they willingly jumped behind a man who's only intention was to con them in every sense of the word.
Part of what helps the sleep is watching the republican party fall to pieces because of voters like you.
https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2016-trump-family-fortune/
Full article at link. Unlike the Kennedy / bootlegging rumours, this is actually true. (Though I remember reading that Joe Kennedy was proven to have done something much worse than bootlegging, but I don't remember what.)
@Cojopi Extomino you helped get Trump elected? I and the country thank you bud
I dont even know where this all started and regarding which of punk's comments. I dont really care that much and this shit conversation has been merged making it even more difficult to know what the fuck I was even originally responding to.
You can quote if to clarify or just shit post. Your choice. I dont care that much to figure it out after the thread got merged
The thread got merged bruh... you can keep crying tho
I don't see any history of this thread being merged with another.
it's not "because I've been told my only other choice is someone I 100% disagree with" it is "you have two choices, choose one. if you choose anything but these two you are throwing your vote away"
and this election WAS "the lesser of two evils" most people knew that going in. it doesn't matter if that was the intent of democracy or not, that what this was. it doesn't matter how much you hate it, that is what it was.
hillary and trump represented very different ideologies. if you're claiming neither one was more agreeable to you than the other you are straight up lying.
i never said that. i said that i know that in elections with only 2 candidates
that have a chance of winning you need to choose one of those two or you're throwing your vote away. you can choose the one you like the most or you can choose the one you hate the least. it doesn't matter, there were only 2 candidates in that race
you can still have principles and vote between the only 2 candidates that had a chance.
you also helped get trump in the white house. congrats on that btw.
the accomplishment is voting for someon that you either wantged in the white house or preventing from someon you didn't want in the white house from getting in. you did neither. your vote was worthless.
no, it's literally the people that wanted to keep trump out of the white house but couldn't be bothered to actually vote for the one person who could have prevented it.
all the people in the swing states that thought that hillary was a sure thing so they didn't even need to bother going out and voting, all the people in the blue states that didn't bother voting and eventually turned the state red. they are the reason. all the "never trump" who though hillary was going to win so they did a dumb fucking protest vote. they almost take as much blame for trump being elected as the trump voters themselves. you, and they, could have prevented trumps presidency but they didn't feel like preventing it.
So not the Presidential Election of 2016.
the full quote...i never said that. i said that i know that in elections with only 2 candidates
i never said that. i said that i know that in elections with only 2 candidates that have a chance of winning you need to choose one of those two or you're throwing your vote away. you can choose the one you like the most or you can choose the one you hate the least. it doesn't matter, there were only 2 candidates in that race
this is ironic considering i posted 1 picture that you can't let go of. yet you started this post with a picture.I eagerly await the next hilarious picture.
what you quoted for this response
the full quote...
this is exactly why i don't bother responding to half of your stupid shit. you're taking things out of context to the point that you are literally quoting half of a sentence and arguing that
how many candidates had a real chance of winning the presidential election of '16 and what were the chances?
this is ironic considering i posted 1 picture that you can't let go of. yet you started this post with a picture.
the joke is shit because it's a two party race despite how many irrelevant idiots try to join inYou really couldn't tell I did that intentionally just to make a joke reasserting my position?
yes, because it wasn't meant as they literally have a chance as in .0000001% . it was meant as do they have a realistic chance. the answer is no, so even mentioning them is fucking dumbDoes real mean something different when it's italicized? Any candidate with a well articulate platform had a chance. Only 2 had a very good chance. But that's only because of 2 parties who've warped the mindsets of easily manipulated people like you. The rest of us don't submit to the corruption of our democracy just because we feel it's too late to fix it.
the joke is shit because it's a two party race despite how many irrelevant idiots try to join in
yes, because it wasn't meant as they literally have a chance as in .0000001% . it was meant as do they have a realistic chance. the answer is no, so even mentioning them is fucking dumb
Rubber condoms have been around since the 1850s. Modern latex condoms originated in the 1920s. Before the AIDS crisis it was common for sex workers not to use them at all.Back then, did dudes use rubber? Were they commercially available, or did the ladies let them be raw-dogged? How did they control pregnancies and STD's?
Depending on the state, the round of voting, and your registration, yes.Tell me more about superfluously peacocking as you spend 34973 words arguing the semantics surrounding a broken and misused system.
Answer this: when you go to vote, can you only vote for a democrat or a republican?
An unlimited number.Answer this: How many political parties exist in the US?
Yes.Answer this: Are those parties capable of being involved in a general election with enough support?
The fact that you don't have to vote for a candidate from one of the major two parties is not mutually exclusive to the definitions of the system.Answer those 3 questions, then write me another novel about how we only have a 2 party system. The truth is "the majority of America has been tricked into thinking we have a 2-party system". But all you have to do is cast a vote for something other than a republican or democrat to see that's factually incorrect.
Depending
on the state, the round of voting, and your registration, yes.
Are you one of those people who debates politics on the internet, but doesn't vote? How in the blue fuck does an American adult not know this?
An unlimited number.
Follow-up question: How many have primary tickets?
Yes.
Follow-up question: do they currently have or have they ever had that support?
Second follow-up: perusing history, when a third party has gained enough support to successfully disrupt one of the major party platforms, what has typically been the result of that disruption? Which time did the two-party platform implode?
The fact that you don't have to vote for a candidate from one of the major two parties is not mutually exclusive to the definitions of the system.
Your inability to grasp this simple fact reflects a capacity for comprehension that exceeds mere ignorance.
No, the only thing that I learned was your ignorance to our voting process.My question had nothing to do with specific circumstances, and you know it.
No, the only thing that I learned was your ignorance to our voting process.
Be quiet and read more.
You're welcome. Just doing my part to help destroy the republican party.
Hey remember when you pretended you couldn't remember what you were saying because a thread was merged, and then a mod pointed out nothing was merged and you were a liar?
Of course you don't, you fled from that scene.
Try acquiring some credibility before talking again ODB. You're really hurting yourself lately.
Hahahaha I just realized what happened. I posted in the other thread and you quoted me here for absolutely no reason. My original comment was to some idiot saying Punk had the same political experience as Trump.
What the fuck are you going on about?
Some of you should charge Trump rent for all the time he spends in your heads.