- Joined
- Sep 17, 2009
- Messages
- 25,730
- Reaction score
- 1,384
Yeah. It's bullshit.
Turns out it isn't simply all BS, but whatever. Agree to disagree.
Yeah. It's bullshit.
Not a lot of discussion on the actual proposal in here, just a lot of "I don't like Peterson".
How much did the globalist pay you to post this?As with anyone that buys into the "Cultural Marxism" conspiracy theory, he's catering to the conservative persecution complex.
There's no shortage of examples showing that to be a path to popularity.
I don't think it'd make any difference what so ever. If they're going to the site, they've obviously already bought into Peterson's views and are therefore unlikely to be taking courses in Critical Race Theory or similar topics.
I can't imagine anyone's going to stop him, so go for it.
How much did the globalist pay you to post this?
As with anyone that buys into the "Cultural Marxism" conspiracy theory, he's catering to the conservative persecution complex.
There's no shortage of examples showing that to be a path to popularity.
Doesn't that also apply to the people looking to use this site since they're avoiding professors that disagree with them?Well, some people fear exploring ideas outside of those within their social circles. So it stands to reason they would be intimidated by anything that might challenge their way of thinking. Intimidation isn't necessarily an action, it could be just difficult terrain. Such as 1+1 for a wee tyke, or a snowy road for our southern Sherbros. Have some sympathy you heartless monster!
Sam Harris in no way comes close to Peterson in terms of credentials in their respective fields.Some of those names were at least big names in their field.
Peterson is not
I like that term "conservative persecution complex"
Did you read that somewhere or did you make that up on your own.
If every "intellectual leader" is hiding in a laboratory, then mediocre intellectuals are the best that we can ask for, to partake in the public debates.
Or would you prefer that the public debate continues to be dominated by celebrities and people with no education whatsoever?
Doesn't that also apply to the people looking to use this site since they're avoiding professors that disagree with them?
Sam Harris in no way comes close to Peterson in terms of credentials in their respective fields.
Not sure who coined it. Actually it was mostly brought up in the context of moderating this site.
Perhaps to a small degree. But disagreement seems to be the norm here.Doesn't that also apply to the people looking to use this site since they're avoiding professors that disagree with them?
Those two are which is why I didn't single them out. Dawkins is basically a grumpy old troll nowadays but back in the day he was no joke so I can forgive him resting on his laurels. But Sam has published nothing of consequence in neuroscience. Doesn't mean he's not worth listening to, just that if we're using contributions to one's field as a measuring stick here than Peterson> Harris.Krauss was a leader in cosmology and i could be wrong but wasn't Dawkins as well.
I wasn't referring to the WR but the site Peterson is trying to set up which steers students away from so called cultural Marxist professors.Perhaps to a small degree. But disagreement seems to be the norm here.
Oh. D'oh! That makes more sense.Those two are which is why I didn't single them out. Dawkins is basically a grumpy old troll nowadays but back in the day he was no joke so I can forgive him resting on his laurels. But Sam has published nothing of consequence in neuroscience. Doesn't mean he's not worth listening to, just that if we're using contributions to one's field as a measuring stick here than Peterson> Harris.
I wasn't referring to the WR but the site Peterson is trying to set up which steers students away from so called cultural Marxist professors.
He more than doubled his overall earnings with his Patreon account, it was bound to have an effect him in the long run.Shitcan all of sociology and anthropology?
He's gone full fucking quack. Which was kind of inevitable, but he'll argue himself out of relevance soon enough.
Those two are which is why I didn't single them out. Dawkins is basically a grumpy old troll nowadays but back in the day he was no joke so I can forgive him resting on his laurels. But Sam has published nothing of consequence in neuroscience. Doesn't mean he's not worth listening to, just that if we're using contributions to one's field as a measuring stick here than Peterson> Harris.
I wasn't referring to the WR but the site Peterson is trying to set up which steers students away from so called cultural Marxist professors.
He monetized his YT site too, no? He's probably around a $million for the year with that, Patreon, speaking fees, etc.He more than doubled his overall earnings with his Patreon account, it was bound to have an effect him in the long run.
I don't think Peterson is dumb but the way the right wing carries water for this guy you'd think he was one of the smartest people to ever live