- Joined
- Mar 13, 2017
- Messages
- 26,525
- Reaction score
- 5,764
Michelle Pfieffer the most sexiest as catwoman for sure she was so nasty and sexual, Lynda Carter the most beautiful and classy as wonderwoman.
I don't think Lynda Carter can beat Hayek; Hayek has a lock on #2 like Bellucci has a lock on #1.Too late, already got this one going.
http://forums.sherdog.com/threads/whos-the-hottest-wonder-woman.3680083/
If Carter beats Gadot, who's ranked #16, she'll automatically eligible to be ranked higher, and she'll get a shot against the #1 ranked Salma Hayek.
If she can't beat #16 Gadot, there's no reason to put her against the #1.
Gal had a nose job as a teen this is her real nose
Agree. At 66 she still looks great for her age.Linda Carter in her prime may well have had one of hollywood's all time best natural bodies.
Bobbi Star as Velma
thats a silly thing to say.Not.
Even.
Close.
She was hot for the 70s, but women have been progressively hotter every decade since.
Even Pam Anderson, Ali Landry, and Cindy Crawford, the icons of the 80s & 90s, aren't doing well in Prime Polls.
And don't make me do a Gal Gadot VS Linda Carter thread to prove you wrong.
http://forums.sherdog.com/threads/whos-the-hottest-wonder-woman.3680083/Not.
Even.
Close.
She was hot for the 70s, but women have been progressively hotter every decade since.
Even Pam Anderson, Ali Landry, and Cindy Crawford, the icons of the 80s & 90s, aren't doing well in Prime Polls.
And don't make me do a Gal Gadot VS Linda Carter thread to prove you wrong.
if you have to the ability to step out of your own era, or just don't give a fuck who in current youth culture is being push on you as 'hot' or maybe you're older now and decades all mash into one, a good looking woman is a good looking woman, the only difference today is a lack of ''demureness''....thats a silly thing to say.
People over whelming vote on recency. People they see during their time and fantasize about during their time because those people are relevant then.
I do not even know the results of those 'prime' polls but i would bet you position can be disproven by simply looking back at contenders who were up against other contenders, both from different decades but none relevant during most of our voters life times and seeing if the latter generations alway beat the prior.
Meaning I would bet some prime 50's beauties could beat 60's and then 70's and so on. and as you correlate tot he voters age and you start to see 'women they saw growing up' then you will see the landslide change.
Whoever this is.