Regardless, I gave you several chances to redeem yourself in that thread, and you tucked your pussy and regurgitated the same illiterate talking points in other threads, such as this one. I'm not going to keep addressing your vague comments about the ACA, and access to healthcare in general, being a boon on non-upper class productivity. There are enough mounds of objective data to the contrary, that any reader worth their snuff can verify.
As far as your purported point on "millions" of those being thrown off healthcare not wanting it in the first place: that's stupid. Those persons make up a negligible cross section of enrollees, since the tax penalty for non-coverage was made a fraction of the costs of coverage, and even if they did exist to any meaningful extent, their being uninsured would shift costs onto the rest of consumers anyways.
As far as NAFTA, I don't have any "particular provision" that I do not like: I don't like the agreement in its entirety.
As far as Trump's renegotiation of NAFTA using the TPP agreement he previously (and correctly, I believed, ignorant to how ignorant Trump was) railed against, I oppose provisions that would allocate political power to transnational corporations by way of making their dispute resolution processes extralegal. The grossest features of TPP were such provisions that insulated international business from state processes and non-corporate considerations.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrap...-day-and-be-based-on-obamas-tpp/#6ad4c7076016
https://www.thenation.com/article/t...nafta-is-starting-to-look-a-lot-like-the-tpp/
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-bl...mps-nafta-goals-arent-new-theyre-from-the-tpp