- Joined
- Sep 24, 2007
- Messages
- 51,212
- Reaction score
- 21,213
I suspect choke off energy and supplies. Strike military resources, "settle in" (too tired to think of the correct word for this, but essentially) spend time there without engaging in mass casualties as a way to convince the citizens of Ukraine it's not an "attack on the people".
Perhaps after they choke off supplies, start offering their own supplies to citizens again as a way to show them they aren't their "against the people", rather against their leadership.
It's going have to be a weird approach to war. It absolutely can't be an all out slaughter like a traditional war. Their biggest obstacle is going to be convincing the populace. It will be interesting to watch for sure.
The main issue with that is how quickly their economy is cratering. Bank runs are coming, their (Russia's) populace back home is going to get REAL restless when the Ruble tanks even farther, store shelves start being empty, etc. The people fear the government and they can institute marshall law if needed, but doing that while waging a foreign war too? And marshall law or not, if people get desperate enough and don't have food on the table shit can go sideways for the Russian gov't back home very quickly.
Not saying you're wrong about the strategy that will be used. I tend to agree. But while in that scenario militarily time would be on their side to use that "soft siege" warfare (that's the only term I can think to use), time would be against them in every NON military way.
So yeah it will be interesting.